Skip to comments.
Is Sarah Palin a McCain-Republican?
January 29, 2010
| David Farrar
Posted on 01/29/2010 3:57:00 PM PST by DavidFarrar
Charlie Crist has taking to calling himself a McCain-Republican in his Florida race against Marco Rubio of late. Apparently, he sees a similarity between himself and Scott Brown. I'll have to admit, calling ones self a McCain-Republican sounds better than simply calling yourself a RINO.
TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: mccain; mittbots; mittromney; palin; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-186 next last
To: patriot preacher
This, sir, goes far, far above simple political loyalty. As I said, she could have been perfectly loyal, in your terms, to McCain by agreeing to support him in his “General”, as she did as his VP candidate — that,I can readily understand.
But to actively campaign in the primary to try and hoodwink as many of our fellow Tea Party supporters into voting for McCain is quite different and politically dishonest, if, as I say, you were truly a new, grassroot, Tea Party anti-incumbent conservative.
So the question remains: Is Sarah Palin a McCain-Republican?
ex animo
davidfarrar
41
posted on
01/29/2010 4:48:50 PM PST
by
DavidFarrar
(davidfarrar)
To: VideoDoctor
Huh?
ex animo
davidfarrar
42
posted on
01/29/2010 4:50:35 PM PST
by
DavidFarrar
(davidfarrar)
To: DavidFarrar
When do you post a thread on Christ for associating with not so Kosher people
43
posted on
01/29/2010 4:52:37 PM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: SoCalPol
Okay, I give up. Which part of these Palin speeches could not have been made by McCain?
ex animo
davidfarrar
44
posted on
01/29/2010 4:53:00 PM PST
by
DavidFarrar
(davidfarrar)
To: SoCalPol
Huh?
ex animo
davidfarrar
45
posted on
01/29/2010 4:53:33 PM PST
by
DavidFarrar
(davidfarrar)
To: patriot preacher
Its one thing to disagree on a candidate, and quite another to jettison an ally over ONE disagreement. Being too hasty could leave you ALONE and thats a strategy that assures defeat it accomplishes nothing.
Ideology and principles are my first priority but perfect conformity of my friends, in addition to being impossible, is an unreachable goal that will do more damage to our nation and our philosophy than anything our adversaries can d
Agreeing with socialists on abortion, amnesty for illegal aliens, global warming, socialist bailouts and ANWR is hardly a minor disagreement and is far from perfect conformity. These are fundamental issues that not strongly opposed and marginalized will leave the country with nothing.
Such rationalization is what has led the OP(formerly the GOP) down the path towards socialism. Anyone who supports any of these issues or endorses one who does is no ally of mine.
46
posted on
01/29/2010 4:54:10 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: DavidFarrar
>> The question is, does Sarah Palin consider herself to be a McCain-Republican?
No, as far as consideration is concerned, Palin's publicly stated that she's a Reagan Conservative.
The question should be: Why does Palin feel the need to continue sacrificing herself for McCain when she and her family have already given so much.
47
posted on
01/29/2010 4:55:10 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: DavidFarrar
Okay, I give up. Which part of these Palin speeches could not have been made by McCain?Oh, good! The false dichotomy. McCain makes speeches on both sides of issues. Show us a Palin speech where she dissembles and lends support to liberal philosophies.
48
posted on
01/29/2010 4:57:04 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid!)
To: Man50D
I agree with you. I’m not the one stumping for McCain.
She
ex animo
davidfarrar
49
posted on
01/29/2010 4:58:17 PM PST
by
DavidFarrar
(davidfarrar)
To: Man50D
Agreeing with socialists on abortion, amnesty for illegal aliens, global warming, socialist bailouts and ANWR is hardly a minor disagreement and is far from perfect conformity.Where and when has Palin ever agreed with those positions?
50
posted on
01/29/2010 4:59:57 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid!)
To: SoCalPol
You still didnt answer who you support for president 2012.
Dont tell me, you cant because you cant defend your candidate.
You're ignoring one simple fact. No on has declared his or her candidacy since it's more than two years away!
You are the typical Neo Leftist out to bash Sarah Palin.
You're employing the Saul Alinsky rules for radicals by isolating a target then attacking anyone who isn't worshiping Palin and yet they are somehow left wingers? LOL!!!
51
posted on
01/29/2010 5:00:58 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: TigersEye
>> For the record: Sarah Palin was trashed and undercut by McCain’s staff for being a conservative Republican.
Indeed, and McCain should have fired that miserable staff in defense of his decision - his pick for VP of the US.
52
posted on
01/29/2010 5:01:00 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: TigersEye
Look, these are just speeches, mere words. It’s what people actually do that defines their political positions.
ex animo
davidfarrar
53
posted on
01/29/2010 5:01:13 PM PST
by
DavidFarrar
(davidfarrar)
To: SoCalPol
Usually those who would cannibalize Palin on this site are Romnoids.
I do agree that this direction will not server her well in the long run. If she owes an obligation she needs to keep it to the minimum repayment and get the hell out.
54
posted on
01/29/2010 5:01:39 PM PST
by
Psalm 144
(HealthControl - the new euthanasia, all the way from Chicago to your family.)
To: TigersEye
Where and when has Palin ever agreed with those positions?
She endorses McAmnesty who supports those socialist positions. Are you claiming she is opposed to all those issues but supports him?
55
posted on
01/29/2010 5:02:33 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: DavidFarrar
Aw Jeez, not another Sarah Palin is a RINO thread.
56
posted on
01/29/2010 5:04:29 PM PST
by
McGruff
(Love ya Sarah but I will support and contribute to JD Hayworth.)
To: DavidFarrar
You still haven’t mentioned the person you support.
The PaulBots, MittWitts, Huckesters, etc only prove
Sarah Palin is the only Conservative Republican who
has the best chance to take out Obama in 2012.
Your support for Obama in 2012 which is your bottom line with your childish threads tell all they need to know about
you
57
posted on
01/29/2010 5:04:33 PM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: TigersEye
When she agreed to stump for him in his Arizona primary. She is attempting to tell good, honest, hard-working, people McCain can be trusted with their votes because HE does believe in all that evils.
Now tell me, fine sir: How does one actully do that with a straight face?
ex animo
davidfarrar
58
posted on
01/29/2010 5:04:38 PM PST
by
DavidFarrar
(davidfarrar)
To: DavidFarrar
Look, these are just speeches, mere words. Its what people actually do that defines their political positions.You were the one who sited a comparison of speeches as a criterion. Now you want to say it's not a valid point? lol
59
posted on
01/29/2010 5:04:48 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid!)
To: Man50D
Are you claiming she is opposed to all those issues but supports him? Avoiding the question is not an answer to the question. Your premise was that she "agreed" with those positions. Now it is up to you to provide a substantive example.
60
posted on
01/29/2010 5:06:38 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-186 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson