Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CALL FOR IMMEDIATE ARREST OF 5 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES FOR TREASON
VeteransToday.com ^ | January 22, 2010 | Gordon Duff

Posted on 01/26/2010 8:34:13 AM PST by Beloved Levinite

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Beloved Levinite

Obama turned AVS off on the credit card campaign donation system, the election was bought and paid for by foreign money from out of the country, period. Why should the presidency be any different, in America, everything is for sale to highest bidder (not saying I’m happy with it). I’m just objective enough to admit what I see.


41 posted on 01/26/2010 9:00:31 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beloved Levinite
Zot Bait if I've ever seen it.

In before.

42 posted on 01/26/2010 9:01:22 AM PST by OKSooner ("He's quite mad, you know." - James Bond to P. Galore in "Goldfinger".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
I guess I’m having trouble understanding WHY this issue is important. WHY is it important that corporations have the same free speech rights as the rest of us? How is this supposed to impact me and my conservative beliefs?

When the first Amendment says "Congress shall make no law ... restricting freedom of speech" it doesn't give an allowance for Congress to restrict corporate speech. You know what I find hard to understand? The idea that corporations are some terrible bogeymen that we should fear if they somehow decide to use part of their funds (for which they are accountable to their shareholders) to pay for political ads, but unions should be free to use funds extorted from their members (for which they are accountable to nobody) to pay for political ads.

43 posted on 01/26/2010 9:01:30 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska
This SCOTUS ruling is just leveling the playing field.

Yhea, I (for the most part) agree.


44 posted on 01/26/2010 9:01:37 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voters: "Here's my DeathCARE Plan"...now....just die (quicky), please. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Corporate personhood is a large package that comes with the ability to be taxed; the ability to be penalized under the law; the ability to own property and the ability to freely express themselves with commercials, newsletter, and political donations. It would be very difficult, if not outright impossible, to throw out part of that without throwing out the rest. Especially given that no taxation without representation is supposed to be one of the big founding concepts of our nation.


45 posted on 01/26/2010 9:02:41 AM PST by discostu (wanted: brick, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Beloved Levinite
Anyway, what is a beer tycoon doing writing about a Supreme Court decision?


46 posted on 01/26/2010 9:05:39 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Here’s your answer.

The shakedown of American Businesses started in CA about 10 years ago with Unions lead by what would become SEIU demanding they hire union employees or they would make demands at stockholders meetings which would damage the company. My company was one of those targeted.

CalPers and SEIU use their pension funds to capture a large enough voting block to bring votes to the floor such as expensing stock options and then pack the room with union members to ram through the vote.

With McCain Feingold in place, private companies are legally prevented from using their funds from fighting back or supporting candidates with disagree with Unions.

The end result was SEIU now controls much of the janitoral services in most high tech companies in CA and the additional union fee $$$ goes directly into funding union supporting candidates such as Obama.

Michelle Malkin points some of this out in her book on Corruption however the impact to American companies is not well known unless you are an insider (like me).


47 posted on 01/26/2010 9:05:40 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Beloved Levinite
Please read full article.

If the first three paragraphs give any indication of the rest of the article, then I won't waste my time.

48 posted on 01/26/2010 9:06:17 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner
Zot Bait if I've ever seen it.
LOL! :D

49 posted on 01/26/2010 9:06:18 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voters: "Here's my DeathCARE Plan"...now....just die (quicky), please. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Good post!
You are right on: If a “corporation” can be taxed, then a “corporation” has free speech rights.


50 posted on 01/26/2010 9:07:16 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Beloved Levinite
CALL FOR IMMEDIATE ARREST OF 5 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES FOR TREASON

ALL CAPS MAKE YOU SOUND LIKE A NUT CASE

51 posted on 01/26/2010 9:07:31 AM PST by McGruff (Love ya Sarah but I will support and contribute to JD Hayworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Five members of the Supreme Court declared that a “corporation” is a person, not a “regular person” but one above all natural laws, subject to no God, no moral code but one with unlimited power over our lives

Wow! Above ALL NATURAL LAWS? Does that mean they can stop paying the second highest corporate tax rates in the world?

52 posted on 01/26/2010 9:07:31 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Beloved Levinite
For years we complained about AIPAC, the Sierra Club, the NRA, trial lawyers, trade unions, NAM (National Association of Manufacturers) and the churches that got involved in politics. Behind all of these were people, American citizens, and, on some occasions

Guess what your church and your NRA and Sierra Club are among those "corporations".

The government was arguing for the power to ban books and films. They deserved to lose on that account alone. I didn't see the free speech issue mentioned in that long long rant

53 posted on 01/26/2010 9:07:35 AM PST by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beloved Levinite

I realize it’s a double-edged sword. But if you let these commies limit freedom of speech, they will eventually kill the whole thing. ALL corporations need the ability to freely stick up for themselves. Their doing so is not really the problem...the ignorance of those not being able to disguish between the commie progressives influence and those that believe in our Constitutional Republic is the problem.

When have we EVER been free of these international corporations having influence? Mostly NEVER. How do you think Ayatollah Obama got elected? Money laundried through corporations and PAC’s, and his Muslim mafia friends in Chicago.


54 posted on 01/26/2010 9:08:32 AM PST by RowdyFFC (The opinion of a wise Welshtino woman...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Where was the author when Obama campaign took in millions from overseas with no documentation?

Isn't this precisely the issue? These frauds want to have the freedom to corrupt the system without recrimination so long as they can control their opposition. Speech is speech and it is protected by the Constitution.

Fortunately we still have a majority on the Court who accept the rudiments of the Constitution as inviolable.

The blathering claptrap of Obama and his minions is a canker in the mouth of the body politic.

55 posted on 01/26/2010 9:09:27 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (He is the son of soulless slavers, not the son of soulful slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The government argued for the power to ban books, films and anything else that was “feloniously political”. Imagine if this government banned Limbaugh’s or Levin’s book, book publishers are corporations after all.


56 posted on 01/26/2010 9:10:33 AM PST by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

57 posted on 01/26/2010 9:11:21 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: All
If anyone else had the misfortune of reading the entire column, as I did, this should help disinfect your mind:

Corporate Rights and Property Rights are Human Rights: Why it’s a Mistake to Conflate a Right with the Means Used to Exercise it. [Free Republic]

58 posted on 01/26/2010 9:17:24 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
WHY is it important that corporations have the same free speech rights as the rest of us?

Let's rephrase the question. Why is it important that some corporations have free speech rights while others have none?

The New York Times Corporation has unlimited free speech. The Washington Post Corporation has unlimited free speech. AOL Time Warner has unlimited free speech.

Yet, the Halliburton corporation can be savaged on a daily basis by left wing charlatans and just has to take it. A coal corporation has to just shut up and go out of business as political careers are made by demonizing them.

A corporation is merely a way to organize people. Why shouldn't they have the same rights as, say, a community organizer?
59 posted on 01/26/2010 9:18:15 AM PST by Question Liberal Authority (Why buy health insurance at all if you can't be turned down for any pre-existing conditions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Beloved Levinite
First of all, corporations can’t vote. People vote. Corporations are owned by stock holders, who are people. Corporations are already flooding the parties with money, but they give it to the Party, not an individual. That is a game they play. Whoever wrote this article does not understand very much about how politics and corporations work. The five on the US Supreme Court should be given a medal for saving America.
60 posted on 01/26/2010 9:19:56 AM PST by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson