Posted on 01/22/2010 7:56:34 PM PST by La Lydia
This memo was just distributed to all Senate chiefs of staff:
From: Adam Green, co-founder, Progressive Change Campaign Committee -- on behalf of the PCCC, Democracy for America, and Credo Action
RE: The right lesson from Massachusetts & the path forward on health care
We wanted to make sure you saw the Massachusetts Research 2000 poll, reported on by the Wall Street Journal, NBC, Politico, Huffington Post, TPM, and others. It polled critical 2010 swing voters: the 18% of Obama voters who returned to the polls and voted for Republican Scott Brown.
• On health care, they oppose the Senate bill because it "doesn't go far enough" and a whopping 82% support the public option.
• On the economy, by 2 to 1 they think Democrats have put special interests ahead of folks like them -- and by large margins think stronger regulation of Wall Street is more important than cutting spending.
• And 57% say Democrats are not "delivering enough on the change Obama promised."
Why did they vote for Scott Brown? They are angry and want Congress to fight on their side against entrenched power. Scott Brown pretended to be a populist, so he won.
Joe Lieberman, Evan Bayh, and Mark Penn are telling Democrats to learn exactly the wrong lesson: Slow down. Give Americans less change.
It's not an accident that each of these men have crashed presidential campaigns into the ground. Don't listen to them -- their thinking got Democrats into this political mess. Voters want bold populism, and if Democrats don't give it to them Republicans are ready to pretend they will.
The best thing Democrats could do in 2010 is fight big corporations like insurance companies and Wall Street. On health care, the path forward is obvious:
Step 1 -- The Senate passes a "reconciliation" bill with the popular public option and other budget-related fixes to the original Senate bill on issues like the national exchange and excise tax. This takes only a simple majority.
Step 2 -- The House passes both the original Senate bill and final reconciliation bill back-to-back and sends them to the President.
Step 3 -- A signing ceremony takes place that Democrats and voters can be proud of.
What would this "public option through reconciliation" strategy achieve? A popular public option, 30 million new Americans insured, pre-existing conditions provisions, a national exchange that "gives people access to the same kind of plan Congress gets," and all the other insurance industry reforms Democrats have been pushing. All without worrying about Joe Lieberman's vote.
Plus, Democrats would be popular -- for finally taking on insurance companies by passing the public option. Again, among the swing Obama voters, only 32% support the current Senate bill but 82% want a public option.
All the old arguments against using reconciliation are gone. It's now the only way to pass a comprehensive health care bill, building off the Senate's prior work. And once reconciliation is being used, the Senate has the votes to pass a public option.
After Massachusetts, passing the public option is a no-brainer -- it's populist, it's good policy, and it's what 2010 swing voters want.
That's why in the 48 hours after the Massachusetts election, over 150,000 people signed a petition advocating the "public option in reconciliation" strategy. More are signing literally every minute, and our three organizations will deliver these signatures to you in the near future.
Thanks for your time.
“If these libtards are this clueless they shouldn’t run a lemonade stand much less a country.”
People like these don’t run squat, they work for hospitals, welfare offices and PETA.
This does not sound like the nuclear option, is it?
The nuclear option is when the majority of the Senate ends a filibuster by invoking a point of order which declares the filibuster unconstitutional (which can be decided by a simple majority), rather than by seeking formal cloture which requires 60 votes. Frist was going to use it to stop the Democrats from blocking Bush’s judicial nominations, but he was blocked by the bipartisan Gang of 14, which included McCain and Linsey Graham and the other usual Republican suspects. This is what they are going to get in return for their trouble (what they would call a “principled” stand).
The author of the memo could have saved a lot of time by just saying “The Kool-Aid line forms on the left.”
Whoa there partner. There is way too many in the medical field that hate the government option or just about any option that Congress is going to come up with. You are painting with a very large brush with that statement.
“Let them Sleep”
Frist was going to use it to stop the Democrats from blocking Bush’s judicial nominations, but he was blocked by the bipartisan Gang of 14, which included McCain and Linsey Graham and the other usual Republican suspects. This is what they are going to get in return for their trouble (what they would call a “principled” stand).
////////////////////
ok. Thank you but now what is the Reconcilliation thing they are talking about?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.