Posted on 01/22/2010 6:06:18 PM PST by restornu
Please post your short list of your preferences for best all around conservative candidate for president in 2012.
Here’s mine:
Sarah Palin.
Its true. So why do you apparently reveal in it?
I guess, hard to tell exactly what she is saying, she is sputtering more than usual...
Here’s mine:
ZIP, ZERO, NADA. If I had to choose from the media picks we see, I would also take Palin at this moment. Begrudgingly.
If I had to pick one REAL conservative, it would be Jim Inhofe, the only guy who really walks the talk. But he’d never make it, not enough ‘flash’ for the crowd. He was the ONLY congressman who paid his own way to Copenhagen to speak up for us.
“Romney has the best chance in 2012.
It’s normally customary that if you are discussing someone’s comment you should put their name in the “To:” line. If you have a problem with the quote, it’s not mine. Take it up with the author.”
Oh, stiffle it. I posted what you posted and you didn’t ping him either when you posted it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2435243/posts?page=43#43
Romney is a two-bit, two-faced, lying political whore.
What’s the difference again between Obama’s unconstitutional, pro-death, pro-abortion, un-american, anti-liberty, socialist government run health care system and Romney’s unconstitutional, pro-death, pro-abortion, un-american, anti-liberty, socialist government run health care system?
You’re pretty close to right. If Sarah fails us, I have no candidate.
Which of course means on the liberal scoreboard Romney is ahead of B Hussein in the points standing...
It doesn’t. I agree with Jim’s statement. A Palin fan posted that Sarah is on the right track because of McCain/Palin adviser Fred Malek.
Fred Malek supports Romney. You square it, I can’t.
Just another of the many contradictions in this political climate.
I pinged him to the conversation a few posts earlier. Tough schnugs.
Oh, man I just need to eat another donut. Off the track, but isn’t it amazing that one donut is to much but twelve aren’t nearly enough.
Dang'it Jim...now you've given me a dilemma. Do I change my tagline or keep the one I have!! LOL.
I like Mitt, but he simply will never be the man.
Romney cannot defeat the forces of darkness in this nation.
Scott Brown did that. He won.
Scott Brown did what Romney could not do. He won a Senate seat and he saved our country.
For now.
Everything has changed since Tuesday. That is everything changed a year ago, but we put the brakes on it here.
I expect much more from the rest of the FR community and their neighbors when the voting starts again.
Palin, on the other hand.....
I say go Sarah.
“Romney is a two-bit, two-faced, lying political whore.”
Agreed. That’s why I’m confused over the fact that Fred Malek is endorsing Romney when he was McCAin’s adviser and is supposed to be the guy leading Sarah Palin in her policies.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2434882/posts?page=22#22
” she follows the advice and direction of this big time power broker and McCain money man, who can make and break GOP politicians...
Fred Malek
Listen, Sarah is not operating in a vacuum, but is planning with and receiving advice from a number of very influential GOP POTUS makers. She backs McCain and Malek continues to back her behind the scenes. She is playing the game that has to be played. Trust her instincts! They have served her well so far.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2435557/posts?page=10#10
[snip]Fred Malek, a heavyweight Republican fundraiser and kingmaker, has singled out former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney as the GOPs leading contender in the early stages of the 2012 Republican presidential derby.
In a largely unnoticed post to his blog late last week, Malek, a wealthy businessman who served as national finance co-chair of John McCains 2008 presidential campaign, ranked Romney No. 1 on a list of influential Republicans who might both lead our party back and who might be our nominee in 2012.
I have to tell you, I have no idea how anyone could say that. His record completely denies that statement. I could give a rats petootie what he says, politicians say a lot of things. I look at the record and his is anything but conservative.
The tea party is basically anti incumbent because the incumbents (Democrats and Republicans alike) have failed to abide by the constitution. Sarah Palin is a tea party favorite because of her strong pro-life & liberty conservative stances on all issues. Should she go too far in supporting incumbents simply because they are Republican, she will quickly fall out of favor. I hope that doesn’t happen.
McCain needs to retire (or be retired) for the good of the country.
I generally agree with the tea party sentiment: Just vote them all out in 2010 (and continue in 2012)!!
” I dont have a problem with states doing it themselves.”
I sure do, no government should provide health care, federal, state, county, or, city!!!!!!
Pay for it or lay down in the street and die!
What?
Yup. Socialism through force of government (mandates) is anti-liberty and anti-American at any level.
Throw the bums out!!
No shortage of bums to throw out here in Maryland
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.