Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: djf
I do not understand what your point is here. It was always understood, from the time of the adoption, of the Constitution that state citizenship & federal citizenship were not one in the same. I am completely familiar of the Slaughterhouse case and it upheld the 1866 Act & the 14th regarding slaves, not foreign nationals.

Are you trying to insinuate that the court meant for word State to also mean foreign nation?

What I put forth was the LAW, not a court decision. There was no such thing as dual citizenship/dual nationality. Therefore according to US law, the only way to be a natural born citizen was to be born to 2 US citizen parents.

Sorry if this concept is too hard for you to understand, but it was the law and it was the definition for A2 qualification that was adopted & ratified in the constitution.

19 posted on 01/15/2010 9:34:10 AM PST by patlin (1st SCOTUS of USA: "Human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: patlin

Listen, noob, your post at 9 says there is no such thing as dual citizenship.

You sound like you are having trouble understanding a lot of things...

Now you seem??? to be saying there is, (or at one time might have been) dual citizenship.

Until you get around to clearing your head out and stating a consistent position, well, I got better things to do...


21 posted on 01/15/2010 11:10:39 AM PST by djf (2010 in review: A handfull of Wall Street banks got way more help than Haiti!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson