Posted on 01/13/2010 7:55:32 AM PST by SalAOR
With the polls showing the race tightening and Scott Browns victory within reach, Coakley is getting nervous, and she is acting nervous. This is very bad for her and good for us, as it brings in another factor common to New England Politics that may have an impact on the election. Ive written about it before as a possible factor in the Massachusetts (or is it Massachusettes) Senate race, and it appears that it is now coming to fruition.
In New England politics, people vote Democrat by and large. There are a few things, however, that often sway some of the less committed Democrats to vote Republican. One of these is the bi**h factor. You see, people just dont like unpleasant liberal women* running the state. It has been my experience that many liberal women have a chip on their shoulder, and when this comes through in a campaign in Massachusetts or any other New England state (except perhaps for Vermont), that woman is toast.
(Excerpt) Read more at axisofright.com ...
Does Coakley have any children?
No doubt the election stealers are at the ready with thousands of phony absentee ballots.
Voting machines not working in certain areas, and votes not counted. Much like the District #23 in NY state.
And then there’s the all important c*nt factor.
As in, “I just c*n’t see how anyone in their right mind would vote for this b**ch!
NO! She probably aborted all of them.
Does she have any children????
I have no idea, but I’m gonna go out on a limb and say
NO!
I am going to prejudge Coakley as belonging to the Unholy Trinity of ‘women’ like the two Janets, Reno and Napolitano.
The Left has a tendency to ‘hire’ or ‘appoint’ women like this because, don’tcha see, their lack of ‘ties’ to a family means they have no diversions or ‘distractions’ in getting all the serious work done their lofty positions require. ALL THREE OF THEM have a history of prosecuting or
potentially prosecuting innocent people—Reno built her career on it in Florida with their daycare witch hunt, Coakley did the same thing by ruining the lives of the Amiraults in order to advance her political career, and Napolitano, eager to join this special “Girl’s Club”, was ready to do it, as that leaked Homeland Security Document proved-—ready to go after Iraq war vets, Tea Partiers, just about everyone else not within the Charmed Circle of Commies she belongs to.THese are all evil, stupid bitches and a discredit to their gender. And NOW,on to Google to see about Coakley and her “brood”.
>> Does Coakley have any children?
No, she didn’t get married until 40 or so and she and hubby consciously decided against it. Little tykes just get in the way of your career don’tchaknow.
Thats what I thought. One of those women who think children would get in the way but spew that they know whats best for families and children and women. You can tell. There is not a softness about her at all. ie. Janet 1 and Janet 2 and Gloria, lol.
She evidently has devoted her adult life to her career moves.She has no children and is married to one Thomas F. O'Connor, Jr.
Career-driven liberal women are generally one-dimensional, overly-professional, rather humorless and brittle.....and not exactly your Irish Mother Machree type. I was well-acquainted with many of them during my own political career.
Leni
I did my research-—no mention of children anywhere, but she is married to a retired Police Supervisor named Thomas O’Connor, (aka, “The Beard”) Sadly I also learned that she does have a Labrador Retriever with the same name as our late black Lab, Beauregard.
And. oh, yeah......she and Thomas like walking on the beach together.....
BTW: Given Scott Brown's promise to vote against ObamaCare, the irony is too rich for all of you not to donate a couple bucks to Brown's campaign in these last few days. I did and I feel great!
Hope Brown will make maximum hay out of the guest list from Coakley’s fundraiser last night in D.C. The suspicion that Obamacare is a payoff to health insurance and pharm interests seems validated by the lobbyists who showed up with big checks for Coakley.
“Career-driven liberal women are generally one-dimensional, overly-professional, rather humorless and brittle.....and not exactly your Irish Mother Machree type. I was well-acquainted with many of them during my own political career.”
I believe you competently described Hillary Clinton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.