Posted on 01/05/2010 10:34:57 AM PST by usalady
Top scientists and the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency are collaborating in an effort to assess the hidden complexities of environmental change.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
If the CIA is involved...it must be true!!!/s
That’s a great use of national resources...
Forget that whole ‘terrorism’ thingy
We need to have them looking at Globull Warming!
al Qaeda, What al Qaeda?
... a much more worthy use of our national intelligence assets than, say, protecting Americans against ‘man-made disasters’.
The CIA should spend its resources looking for terrorists and not trying to justify the global warming hoax. Good Lord, where are the priorities?????
follow the money
some contractors and consultants are getting rich off this project, follow their connections to Congress
So we will stick to question of controlling the weather.
That's already in the past ~ a whole decade in the past.
It seems to me that the article is poorly written ~ or maybe the writer was simply not given enough information to figure out what's going on.
The AGW/GW thesis is that Earth toked up over the decade of the 1990s and hit peak in 1998. Then, later, non-intelligence satellites took over the job previously done by ground weather stations all over the planet and produced data dramatically different than what the AGW/GW fans had expected ~ to wit: It Ain't Heatin' Up!
So, the deal here is to go back and review data from CIA satellites for the 1992 to 2001 period to find out what was really going on.
As many of us expect, that data will show it wasn't heating up on a global scale ~ just some local stuff of peculiar interest ~ e.g. in the Arctic ocean perhaps.
The AGW/GW people expect to see full-blown global warming. They will be seriously disappointed. It didn't happen.
Besides, the CIA has to dovetail it's own data with current data to know what's really happening with the Arctic. After all, those sneaky Russians could be coming after us in rubber boats or something.
I would call this criminal misuse of government resources.
ML/NJ
silly me, I ***thought*** we had a variety of weather satellites to track weather and a variety of spy satellites to track our enemies.
Unless the CIA is going to track the activities of Al Gore Jr. and his London based company Generation Investment Management LLP, they will only be tracking the “Lack” of Climate Change.
Exactly... why cant NASA deal it?
Why should the CIA’s facilities and resources be reduced to meteorological studies?
Other than to further diminish the much needed resource base and redirect activities...
Oh I understand, weather will cause more suffering than terrorism///// send up some balloons. USe google earth.
CIA is CIA!
Evidence supporting “climate change” is so elusive they need to call in the CIA?
What a great use for our national security team. Before long, we’ll know if the terrorist farts put out more carbon emmissions than ours do.
Their plan probably to generate new database proof of warming. They’ll start the database temperature measurements with this unusually cold winter as the baseline fully knowing that temps will likely be up up up from here.
...because they have so much free time, doncha know...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.