To: af_vet_rr
That interview is now 13 months old and she has never refuted her support for a pathway to citizenship. You can claim that she was being ambiguous or that she was forced to say that by Juan McAmnesty, and I'll even support you to an extent given what I know of the campaign, but she's been free and clear of the campaign for a year now and has had ample opportunities in dozens of interviews to come out one way or the other.
I'm like you, I want potential leaders to be honest with the American public about their stances on important issues.
To be clear, I did not mean the interview she gave WHILE SHE WAS THE VP of A CANDIDATE THAT SUPPORTED SUCH POSITIONS.
I was referring to her interview with Lars Larsen and in that interview she did not answer that part of the question.
Your attempt to impugn her with this statement:
I'm like you, I want potential leaders to be honest with the American public about their stances on important issues.
falls flat as well. There is nothing about Sarah that would leave an HONEST person to believe she is not being honest about her positions on the issue. With the possible exception of Duncan Hunter, she is the straightest shooter of any potential 2012 POTUS candidate.
Furthermore, you have still refused to answer my question concerning who among the potential 2012 candidates you are currently supporting even though it is early in the game.
So, care to come out from under the covers and tell who you are supporting right now?
To: SoConPubbie
To be clear, I did not mean the interview she gave WHILE SHE WAS THE VP of A CANDIDATE THAT SUPPORTED SUCH POSITIONS.
I was referring to her interview with Lars Larsen and in that interview she did not answer that part of the question.
Why didn't she answer it? It's a pretty straightforward issue - either you support it or you don't.
Furthermore, you have still refused to answer my question concerning who among the potential 2012 candidates you are currently supporting even though it is early in the game.
I didn't because I don't see any potential candidates at this point that I'm interested in. I don't see Palin is running in 2012, and the Republicans that are probably going to run are all RINOs. I made the mistake of supporting the GOP and its RINO candidates from 1988 - 2008 and I'm not making that mistake anymore.
I do like some things about Palin - I like that she's willing to push conservative third party candidates, and I like that she's willing to give a keynote at a convention next year that will be made up of mostly third party supporters.
If you wonder whether I would vote for her, for a start she'd have to be running for a third party.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson