1 posted on
11/25/2009 4:38:09 PM PST by
Duke C.
To: Duke C.
How much money has Al Gore made from this scam? I sure bet he has a humongous smile on his face right now.
2 posted on
11/25/2009 4:42:15 PM PST by
benjibrowder
(For Neda. May God bless those fighting for freedom.)
To: Duke C.
So where is the data and how does it differ?
To: Duke C.; Nervous Tick; 4horses+amule; WL-law; Fractal Trader; Beowulf; Genesis defender; ...
6 posted on
11/25/2009 4:49:08 PM PST by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
To: Duke C.
It’s a pity that a strong ethical stance by the NYT precludes them from reporting on this because the data was hacked....
Er, wait a minute. Hmmmmmm.
7 posted on
11/25/2009 4:49:58 PM PST by
Panzerlied
("We shall never surrender!")
To: Duke C.
Now we must ask: do we really need an ETS? For, if all that nasty carbon dioxide and methane we are pumping into the atmosphere has utterly failed to increase our temperature until now, why ever should it do so in the future? Oh... my... God!
These AGW freaks are SO busted!
8 posted on
11/25/2009 4:58:37 PM PST by
Rocky
(Obama's ego: The "I's" have it.)
To: Duke C.
Global Warming fraud Bump.
9 posted on
11/25/2009 5:05:51 PM PST by
RJL
To: Duke C.
"Dr Jim Salinger (who no longer works for NIWA) started this graph in the 1980s when he was at CRU (Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, UK) and it has been updated with the most recent data."
That's not a smoking gun, that's still "fire in the hole".
10 posted on
11/25/2009 5:08:26 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: Duke C.
Thanks for posting. Beyond contempt. The HEAT should really be turned up on these perpetrators and their propagandists.
11 posted on
11/25/2009 5:09:37 PM PST by
PGalt
To: Duke C.
So what this shows is that rather than drastically “Adjusting” current temps up then they mostly adjusted past temps down in order to give the illusion of a great rising trend. This makes sense because adjusting current temp numbers would be more blatant and stand out more. Fewer people would look in the past for fraudulent numbers. After all the past is the past.
This must be why the CRU programmer talks so much about playing with the older data. Those must be the actual programs used to commit these frauds by adjusting and manipulating the data. I can’t wait for someone(a wiz programmer with climate knowledge) to go over those programs in extreme detail. We have already heard a little, but there is probably much more.
12 posted on
11/25/2009 5:13:55 PM PST by
Revel
To: Duke C.
I posted a reference to the NZ info via. Watts up with that site, not aware you already posted the whole thing here. It will be interesting in the days and weeks to come to see how many other French cooks are exposed. The cooking has been going on for a long time.
15 posted on
11/25/2009 6:17:40 PM PST by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned....)
To: Duke C.
To: Duke C.; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
21 posted on
11/26/2009 9:01:34 AM PST by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: Duke C.
A very important thread.
Thanks for posting it.
23 posted on
11/26/2009 11:06:51 AM PST by
EternalVigilance
(Separate school and state, before it's too late.)
To: Duke C.; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
24 posted on
11/26/2009 11:09:58 AM PST by
narses
('in an odd way this is cheering news!'.)
To: Duke C.
The graph from the global warmists:
The graph produced by those who have looked at the actual data in New Zealand:
25 posted on
11/26/2009 11:09:59 AM PST by
EternalVigilance
(Separate school and state, before it's too late.)
To: Duke C.
32 posted on
11/28/2009 1:41:21 PM PST by
Dajjal
(Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson