[David]

As documented by J. B. Williams in a post on the Canada Free Press web site, there were actually two different versions of that certification of his nomination that were signed by Pelosi. One of them contained the statement that Obama was constitutionally eligible to be POTUS and the other did not contain such a statement.

I am told, second hand, hearsay, that the certificate signed by VP Cheney, certifying his election by receiving a majority of the vote from the Electoral College, was modified from the form used in prior elections to delete the reference to his eligibility to serve.

I have known for some time about the state certificates for the ballot. Taken together, that is reasonable evidence of knowledge of his ineligibility and of a criminal conspiracy to manipulate the system to install him.

[LucyT]

. . . . . #39.

I am told, second hand, hearsay, that the certificate signed by VP Cheney, certifying his election by receiving a majority of the vote from the Electoral College, was modified from the form used in prior elections to delete the reference to his eligibility to serve.

I have known for some time about the state certificates for the ballot. Taken together, that is reasonable evidence of knowledge of his ineligibility and of a criminal conspiracy to manipulate the system to install him.

[Thanks, David.]

[Spunky]

"I am told, second hand, hearsay,...."

Now David as a lawyer, you know hearsay is not allowed. LOL!

[azishot]

Are you saying that Cheney *didn’t know* about the other State Certification form listing BO as eligible under the Constitution?

I’ve seen both of those forms here, on FR, and can’t honestly remember if there was a conclusion as to why there were two forms in the first place.

Do you know if these forms are included in any of the cases brought against BO?