Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lucas Smith: attorney will file a new legal action against Obama's eligibility
InspectorSmith Youtube.com ^ | Nov. 16, 2009 | Lucas Smith

Posted on 11/17/2009 1:11:11 PM PST by Seizethecarp

Posted by Lucas Smith Nov 16, 9:00 PM:

InspectorSmith

Hello everyone. For some time now I've been looking for a new "in" to get my foot in the door of a courtroom to expose Obama for the native Kenyan that he is. I found an attorney that is willing to work with me, and on my terms. The attorney is originally from Iowa, as I am. We will not be filing Quo Warranto. We will not be filing anything similar to the civil / criminal actions that have been brought against Obama to date. Respectfully, Lucas Smith.

Posted by Lucas Smith Nov 15:

InspectorSmith

11.12.2009 Charles Edward Lincoln III Affidavit and Declaration 09-81255-CIV

This declaration entails an account of Orly Taitz and her miscreant behavior when she wiggles out of her obligations as counsel for clients of Charles Edward Lincoln after Mr. Lincoln has continually fulfilled his obligation to Orly Taitz as legal genius and litigation master for all of Mrs. Taitzs ongoing civil actions filed against US President Barack Obama.

Mr. Lincoln and Mrs. Taitz had been working together since May 2009. Lincoln and Taitz had been working quid pro quo for each other.

Ive uploaded the new CEL III declaration to my Patriot1980 scribd.com account: http://www.scribd.com/doc/22567277/11-12-2009-Charles-Edward-Lincoln-III-Affidavit-and-Declaration-09-81255-CIV

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; birthers; certifigate; fraud; hoax; kenyabc; lucassmith; obama; obamaisthehoax; orly; orlytaitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: LucyT

Good !...


21 posted on 11/17/2009 3:02:56 PM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

http://www.galganov.com/editorials.asp?ID=1147

????


22 posted on 11/17/2009 6:44:18 PM PST by bitt (You canÂ’t make a weak man strong by making a strong man weak (Abraham Lincoln))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thank you.


23 posted on 11/17/2009 8:10:02 PM PST by InspectorSmith (Lucas Daniel Smith 10.12.09 new Declaration SACV09-00082-DOC (Anx))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

What do you mean its been debunked...You are incorrect.
It is in need of authentication, and has been submitted to the court system on Judge Carters case, also included was a sworn statement about how it was obtained by Lucas Smith.
Prove me wrong. Show me where it was debunked. It did not happen.
Orly Taitz and Lucas Smith angrily went their separate ways, not before Smith filed an affidavit saying that Taitz tried to force him to lie. This is not substantiated other than by his word, and has not appeared before a judge for any sort of ruling.
Now Smith is trying to peddle a supposedly 1,000 page document on EBay, I believe to get the story out, and make cash. Lincoln was Taitz law clerk, and was disbarred, she was helping him to keep a house, as I recall. I have not heard until now that he is no longer her law clerk, perhaps so. But the document, I believe is genuine, and needs to be authenticated by a Forensic Analyst. He needs it to be done on a Pro Bono type basis according to his You Tube blog, but I suspect that enough people are interested in authenticating it, that an account could be set up to directly pay for the service. I suggested it to Smith myself, but he is a little hot under the collar right now, so I am going to back out and just let the big dog run, if you know what I mean...

Anyway, in the end, we all want the truth to come out. IMO the courts are not interested in the truth. They are throwing up every roadblock that they can, seeking every avenue to not hear, lot less rule on the constitutionality of Obama to be President. IMO the document needs to be authenticated and made VERY public, to force the courts to act. Lets be reasonable here people. Obama has already stated that his father was born in Kenya, so at best he is a naturalized citizen of the US, NOT a natural born citizen, therefore ineligible to be POTUS. Why does it need to go any further.


24 posted on 11/17/2009 8:17:09 PM PST by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13

Ping


25 posted on 11/17/2009 8:21:41 PM PST by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: etraveler13
Obama has already stated that his father was born in Kenya, so at best he is a naturalized citizen of the US, NOT a natural born citizen, therefore ineligible to be POTUS.

I think you are a bit confused. The children of naturalized citizens are natural born, if born in the US. So it's not his father's birthplace that matters, it's his (BHO Sr) lack of US citizenship at the time of Junior's birth (or ever) that matters. His father was not just born in Kenya, he was born a British subject and was still one when Jr. was born. Later he became a Kenyan citizen, when Kenya became an independent nation, as likely did Junior, but that is neither here nor there regarding Junior's lack of natural born status.

26 posted on 11/17/2009 10:01:39 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tractorman

Hi, Just go to InspectorSmith channel on utube & you will see the documents and read the comments from many who have followed this from the beginning. We report, you decide.


27 posted on 11/18/2009 4:20:43 AM PST by theviking711
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Lucas’ document has never been debunked. Go to his utube channel & read the mant (over 7000) comments there by many who have followed this from the beginning. We have investigated & discussed this for months. We have gotten to know Lucas. We believe it is real & Support Lucas’ action. If you have time, go to the beginning and follow the whole story as well as our input. Post your own comments & ask questions. No matter how you dice it, it has never been debunked. His utube channel is InspectorSmith


28 posted on 11/18/2009 4:20:53 AM PST by theviking711
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

The Constitution does state the legal requirements to be POTUS. He has ignored it and has spent close to $2 million fighting the exposure of the documents. Dual citizens cannot be POTUS. He is a dual citizen at best, an illegal alien at worst.


29 posted on 11/18/2009 4:20:57 AM PST by theviking711
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: theviking711

No, the Constitution states the requirements. I know that.

Its the state rules to get a name on the ballot. In most states you just sign an affidavit and hand in some signatures. In most states the “hurdle” to get on the ballot is quite low.

If you establish some standard identification rules; let’s say the same standards one would use to get a passport, then you could force the issue. Even if it is in one state you could make a “federal case” out of it.

We just need to look at the problem differently. You say he cannot be President because he does not meet the qualifications. I say, he should not be on the ballot if he cannot meet the qualifications. Same end result, two different paths.


30 posted on 11/18/2009 5:51:48 AM PST by Vermont Lt (My wife reads my posts. In case the FBI shows up, we will have cookies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Thanks for the reply, I am not confused, perhaps not clear tho. It is Obama’s being only a first generation U.S. citizen because of his father not being a United States citizen at Obama’s birth that caused his divided allegiance and loyalty at birth (United States v. British and Kenyan) and disqualifies him to be President and Commander in Chief. It is through his father that Obama was born with allegiance and loyalty to Great Britain (which continues until today), which then converted to allegiance and loyalty to Kenya. It does not matter that his mother was a United States citizen because at birth Obama inherited allegiance and loyalty to a foreign power (Great Britain) from his father just as he would have inherited allegiance and loyalty to a foreign power if born to parents who were both non-United States citizens. By Obama’s mother being a United States citizen at his birth, Obama was just spared acquiring even another foreign allegiance and loyalty. Just like a naturalized citizen who—despite taking an oath renouncing all foreign allegiances and loyalties and (which incidentally Obama has never done)therefore cannot be President because he or she is born with allegiance and loyalty to a foreign country, Obama, born with allegiance and loyalty to a foreign country, also cannot be President. All this leads to the inescapable conclusion that Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen” and is therefore ineligible to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military.


31 posted on 11/18/2009 7:25:36 AM PST by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

rxsid - That was the article on the Forum yesterday with Obama’s picture on the cover of The National Enquirer I think. The article that went with the picture was really good tho. Perhaps it’s still on here - I will look ok!! CO


32 posted on 11/18/2009 12:31:22 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Why not Frantzie. Canada will welcome as many more Conservatives as she can get.!! CO


33 posted on 11/18/2009 12:32:36 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
:-)

I was playing golf on Sunday. There were two younger ladies who were a bit slow. Not many people out in the afternoon. They let me play through and were very nice.

I am pretty sure they were Canadian gals as all the snow birds are showing up. I could tell because they were very polite, well spoken, nice, courteous, cute and not heavily tattoo’ed. :-)

34 posted on 11/18/2009 1:32:28 PM PST by Frantzie (Judge David Carter - democrat & dishonorable Marine like John Murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Ah yes, the circus factor. A scam artist has found a new line for scams ...


35 posted on 11/18/2009 1:36:54 PM PST by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Oh, come on!

Lucas' BC is a fake.

Since when has "width between shoulders" ever been on ANY BC?

I challenge you to find a BC from anywhere in the world with that measurement on it. Get out your family members' BCs. See the width of anything there? LOL!

I also challenge you to find a BC - other than the keepsake one given to the parents when the child is born - with a footprint on it. That is, either an official BC issued by a government agency or an actual hospital record (not the keepsake).

And no, Lucas Smith and his BC were NOT found credible by Judge Carter.
36 posted on 11/18/2009 2:58:38 PM PST by Deliberate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

ROTFLMAO!!! How sweet. I guess they never met me. LOL, CO


37 posted on 11/18/2009 4:12:33 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what medicine is to a wound - HEALING!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Deliberate
It was either in FR or in Smith's Youtube blog that evidence was found proving use of shoulder width (biacromial width) on hospital birth certificates for research data gathering.

See:

"The Boyd Orr cohort is an historical cohort study carried out by the University of Bristol Department of Social Medicine to investigate the long term impact of children’s diet, growth, living conditions and health on adult cardiovascular disease. It is based upon based on the 65 year follow-up of the Carnegie Survey of Diet and Health (1937-9)."

http://www.epi.bris.ac.uk/boydorr/

Table 3 Summary of data items in the Boyd Orr cohort, by follow-up phase

• Anthropometric measures: height, leg length (cristal height), weight, shoulder breadth (biacromial width), and foot length

http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/34/4/742/TBL3

Also evidence has been presented in FR of single baby footprints being widely used and even one FReeper claimed to have worked at the last company that made the little machines that ink up the baby's feet.

Judge Carter made no comment on Lucas Smith's BC affidavit, but did express concern that Orly might be engaged in unethical practices based, one can only conclude, on the affidavits of Smith and Larry Sinclair claiming Orly tried to get them to lie.

Smith's affidavit was sufficiently credible for Judge Carter to raise concerns about a member of the bar. This was highly unusual and perhaps even improper of Judge Carter, but it lends credibility to Lucas Smith.

38 posted on 11/18/2009 4:43:25 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Be very careful with those lie detector set-ups. Larry Sinclair took one, but the admin was working for Axelrod and they lies about the whole thing.


39 posted on 11/18/2009 5:26:59 PM PST by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Oh, that's funny! Smith's Youtube blog is "proof".

As I said:

I challenge you to find a BC from anywhere in the world with that measurement on it. Get out your family members' BCs. See the width of anything there? LOL!

I also challenge you to find a BC - other than the keepsake one given to the parents when the child is born - with a footprint on it. That is, either an official BC issued by a government agency or an actual hospital record (not the keepsake).

"biacromial width" may be a measurement taken rarely, for specific purposes, but it has NO place on a BC.

In more that 2 decades of working in the birthing of babies, I have NEVER seen "biacromial width" taken, much less documented.

Also, Lucas claims to have paid a a guard to "look the other way". So how did he get the "certificate" signed and date stamped?

What, he took an illegal/bribed-for certificate to a hospital administrator to sign? Or maybe the Hospital administrator signs and stamps hundreds of thousands of BCs daily in case someone wants one? LOL!

Think, people! Think!

So, show me, show me ANY BC with the width of ANYTHING on it!!! PLEASE!!!


40 posted on 11/18/2009 6:45:18 PM PST by Deliberate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson