Posted on 11/10/2009 5:41:18 PM PST by Federalist Patriot
Here is video of Lt. Col. Ralph Peters on "The O'Reilly Factor" reacting to Obama's Fort Hood speech.
Peters said he was offended when Obama said "the act at Fort Hood was incomprehensible" and "hard to comprehend." Peters said "no, it's not hard to comprehend. It was the act of an Islamist terrorist who gunned down 54 people because he believed he was doing the will of Allah in accordance with the Koran." Peters said "it's clear that the problem is Islam."
Peters said he was also offended by all the speeches today because of the fact that there was "not one mention of terror, terrorist, or terrorism." Peters asked "what evidence does it take for our President to admit that this was an act of terror?" (Video)
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...
save
You’re a terrorist only if you attend a tea party.
AMERICANS who disagree with obama’s agenda are terrorists-he calls us extremists
and today he called hasan an extremist. But hasan will probably get an apology later.
C’mon, one of his best buddies (a gifted ghost writer) who happened to be at Columbia when buraq was at Columbia- was the mastermind of multiple plots to kill soldiers and police officers in the 80’s. That wasn’t terrorism either.
Killing abortion doctors - that’s terrorism. Got it?
Offended? Nope Surprised? Nope Pissed off at the PC morons like Obama and Casey? You betcha.
Lt. Col. Peters should run for office!
view later
From an anonymous Con News Twitter, “No need to jump to conclusion, conclusion not that high.”
LTC Peters consistently delivers the straight talk while the politically correct wussies refuse to face facts. O’Reilly is often one of them, but in this case he correctly named this as an act of terror, and is willing to at least make the radical Islam connection.
After watching him, and listening to O’Reilly and Colmes, I find it hard to understand why the lame stream media wishes to prevent anyone from thinking that this is/was an act of terror.
Are they thinking like the ostrich, that thinks if they don’t see, it, it isn’t happening? One argument was, that since they (the investigators) were unable to see more people involved, that this could not be an act of terror from an al-qaeda jihadist. This is outright infantile.
Even the Koran dictates that every Muslim is to live and fight their own solo jihad if need be, and if an act of terror requires more people to carry out an attack, then more terrorists are organized to act accordingly to produce terror and kill. This guy was in contact with one of the most powerful jihad terrorists in the world and he asked this terrorist Imam what he was to do to further the terror and jihad in the USA as a devout Muslim. Americans are simply sticking their heads in the sand if they are going to try and explain this away as just some wack-job who went crazy.
Why? because all radical jihad terrorists, are wacked out crazy nut jobs, and to state that this single Muslim, who just happened to be an American doctor psychiatrist, is not a terrorist is nonsense: These liberals are trying to gain favor amongst the lame stream media, simply because these people don’t want to accept that we may have solo terrorists in the US and to think they exists in our military scares them even more.
If this act of terror was taken out in a base in any other country, I think this feeling that guy is a victim, would never have gained any momentum. Solo or group jihad terror is still terror, there is no limit under their God that dictates that a jihad must be carried out by a plurality of people. The Koran states that each and every devout muslim is to carry out their own jihad, and killing infidels is something they are to do if they are going to see their glory day.
Are you a doubter, read the Noble Qu’ran from Saudi Arabia, not the one that is spelled out all over our American Websites. The Koran that is spelled out and accessible to American googling, is very much watered down.
I caught a little of Rush’s show this afternoon and one caller hit this one right out of the park. This Administration will do anything to avoid letting this be called terrorism lest they admit that we are not as safe under their control as we were under GWB for the last 7 years since 9-11.
It’s not just terrorism...it’s a new domestic front in the same world war against islamofascism.
That's refreshing. I read an article by the Jesuit James Schall today that was excellent and basically said that our problem is that we refuse to acknowledge that all religions are not the same, do not have the same basis, and do not have the "same" God. Islam's conception is entirely different, and while political leftism has contributed to its potential to cause trouble today, it has been a problem since the very beginning and will continue to be because it is different at its very core. Until we admit that, we will be unable to deal with it and defeat it.
Any time any of us are credibly “afraid for our lives,” we have the right to use deadly force against the threat. All non-muslims should be somewhat afraid for our lives. Gotta be careful about that “credibly” bit, though: consider carefully before firing; there must be a real threat.
For the Gay Muslim, everything is incomprehensible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.