Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canadian Researcher: Prof. Levitt's New Book, Superfreakenomics, Ignores Abortion Risks
RFFM.org ^ | Oct. 29, 2009 | Brent Rooney

Posted on 10/29/2009 6:00:42 PM PDT by Daniel T. Zanoza

Brent Rooney: Superfreakenomics Co-Author Should Leave Medical Matters Alone

Steven D. Levitt's LAUGH-IN / Freakonomics Fried

by Brent Rooney (MSc) *

On Oct. 2009, Univ. of Chicago Prof. Steven D. Levitt debuted Superfreakonomics as a sequel to his best-selling book Freakonomics 2005). Perhaps Levitt is correct about Global Cooling, in his 2009 book, but nothing Levitt writes about medical matters can be believed.

If a young Milton Friedman (PhD, Nobel Prize winner) had opined that “strong increased consumer demand for IPODs or Ivory Soap leads to DECREASED prices”, the loud guffaws would have shattered ears and the business press would have lectured the good professor from the same university as economics professor Steven D. Levitt (Univ. of Chicago).

In 2001 Steven D. Levitt & co-author John Donohue were not pulling an April fool's joke when the pair declared ...

(Excerpt) Read more at rffm.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Business/Economy; Health/Medicine; Science
KEYWORDS: abortion; brentrooney; profstevenlevitt; research

1 posted on 10/29/2009 6:00:45 PM PDT by Daniel T. Zanoza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Daniel T. Zanoza
“If a young Milton Friedman (PhD, Nobel Prize winner) had opined that “strong increased consumer demand for IPODs or Ivory Soap leads to DECREASED prices”, the loud guffaws would have shattered ears and the business press would have lectured the good professor from the same university as economics professor Steven D. Levitt (Univ. of Chicago).”

Wrong!

IMHO, the article was weakened by including the above statement.

Without having read Levitt's book; I know of at least one possible reason that the price of IPODs would decrease, due to increased demand. Economies of scale. The fixed costs, of developing and marketing the product, would be spread over more units — thus allowing lower prices. Competition would provide the incentive for the manufacturer to pass on the cost savings.

Friedman would not have laughed at that — nor would his fellow Chicago School economists. They might have wondered (as I do) what was so startling about the lower prices; that merited the observation being included in a book titled: “Superfreakonomics”.

2 posted on 10/29/2009 6:27:13 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson