Using your standard, any article about that person should mention their entire criminal history. That's stupid.
You are making a mountain out of a molehill, apparently out of your own personal vendetta against Hot Air for not publishing you. And attempting to draw moral equivalence between this and the corruption in the Obama Admin is jawdropping. You really are an ass - given the poor quality of your writing, as many others have noted, you need to spend more time improving yourself and less time bashing successful bloggers. Tearing down successful people and playing moral equivalance games is the hallmark of a petty liberal. Which you have revealed yourself to be.
Theft and fraud is a mountain out of a mole hole. You certainly don’t need to say it gratuitously. Yet, Moncrief is leveling serious charges against Project Vote, so it’s absolutely relevant that before she figured that out she committed fraud upon them and she stole from them. Of course, that’s a big deal.
She used a company credit card she wasn’t supposed to and she used it for personal items. Then, she was fired, which we can all agree was perfectly appropriate.Then, she became a whistle blower. I am not even talking about how she took a company computer and printed out proprietary information about Project Vote and shared it with the media without authorization.
If you are simply writing about her, you don’t have to mention it. If you are saying Anita Moncrief claims that project vote shared email info with Obama but don’t mention her whole history with Project Vote then of course you are willfully not including pertinent information.
All right, my internet is horrible. I am going to watch my alma mater in football. You all can continue this debate on your own.