Theft and fraud is a mountain out of a mole hole. You certainly don’t need to say it gratuitously. Yet, Moncrief is leveling serious charges against Project Vote, so it’s absolutely relevant that before she figured that out she committed fraud upon them and she stole from them. Of course, that’s a big deal.
She used a company credit card she wasn’t supposed to and she used it for personal items. Then, she was fired, which we can all agree was perfectly appropriate.Then, she became a whistle blower. I am not even talking about how she took a company computer and printed out proprietary information about Project Vote and shared it with the media without authorization.
If you are simply writing about her, you don’t have to mention it. If you are saying Anita Moncrief claims that project vote shared email info with Obama but don’t mention her whole history with Project Vote then of course you are willfully not including pertinent information.
All right, my internet is horrible. I am going to watch my alma mater in football. You all can continue this debate on your own.
So, you want Malkin to find an ACORN informant who didn’t have any criminal issues.. good luck with that.. an ACORN church lady. I wonder if the author has anything he isn’t disclosing?
What, you're going to leave without coming clean yourself? Even though it's patently obvious...
Bawk, bawk, bawk. Still no correction of your statement that Malkin doesn't appear on Fox News recently. No denial that you are pursuing this attack on Hot Air because they won't post your blog junk.
Ummmm, isn't that the very act of becoming a whistle blower? What I mean is that act of 'how she took a company computer and printed out proprietary information without authorization' that you apparently are 'not even talking about'?
I think that the misuse of the credit card (if it even occurred, perhaps ACORN could speak out on this) is relevant, but you seem to think that this lack of disclosure makes this a case of offsetting penalties, to use a football term that I know that you understand. Your writing is becoming more and more chaotic as you seem to be trying to extrapolate condemnations that your original complaint is unable to support.
This sounds more like an emotional issue than a corruption issue. People aren't agreeing with you and it's obviously frustrating you. To borrow from Obama, let me be clear: this is not nearly as relevant as you think it is. Deal with it...JFK