I never said she shouldn’t user her, but she needs to mention everything. If someone is using a mobster as an informant, do you think it would be proper not to mention that.
Actually yes, to both protect the informant from retribution, to make sure what they are informing is the issue, not the informant, and to keep the ankle biters from going after the informant.
Welcome to the ankle biter category.
Using your standard, any article about that person should mention their entire criminal history. That's stupid.
You are making a mountain out of a molehill, apparently out of your own personal vendetta against Hot Air for not publishing you. And attempting to draw moral equivalence between this and the corruption in the Obama Admin is jawdropping. You really are an ass - given the poor quality of your writing, as many others have noted, you need to spend more time improving yourself and less time bashing successful bloggers. Tearing down successful people and playing moral equivalance games is the hallmark of a petty liberal. Which you have revealed yourself to be.