Posted on 10/16/2009 7:27:04 AM PDT by little sis
He's an impotent wusp. This is why he is always apologizing. He wants a one world government. He wants the U.S. to be a bit player in an International Court. He has already trashed our Constitution. In fact, he wasn't the first. Obama is finishing the job. I state this with anger ad sadness. I love my country and HATE, absolutely HATE seeing him destroy it and make us into a third world country.
Enemies within.
He can sign it. The Senate has to ratify it and they aren’t going to do so.
Zero isn’t King yet.
Last time they tried this, it got 0 votes in the US Senate. Just cause he signs it doesn’t make it law.
It would be treason. Impeach.
Clinton signed all sorts of things but they had no force of law.
Yep ... those treaty things are much tougher to get around ... 66 votes to ratify.
Carter and Clinton did stupid stuff like this. Heck Clinton even signed onto the Kyoto protocols.
In the USA, the sovereigns are the citizens. They cannot be sold out by the government. We do not have rulers, we have representatives. O-dumb-boy doesn’t get the difference.
Oh no, they didn’t!
Lock and load. Lock and load.
How many votes does it take to ratify a treaty? If it takes only 51, then this is a done deal.
this has nothing to do with real science....’climate change’ is a vehicle for globalist one world government
Says who? They have 60 62 at least 64 Dhimmi votes that would love to vote for such a measure.
Traitors all.
“Yep ... those treaty things are much tougher to get around ... 66 votes to ratify.”
It could be a headfake anyway. He knows it won’t pass but the dems sign the useless silly thing and then get to pass the blame onto the GOP.
Looks bad for the GOP to the Euroevironazis but good to the average US citizen.
It’s a no-win for the dems either way. It just makes their loopy commie arm happy.
“The Senate has to ratify it and they aren’t going to do so.”
They rejected Kyoto because it would cost them. They may go along with this, though, because to be left out of the world governance would be unthinkable.
If this actually sets up a world government (and it de facto does) then some would desperately want to be at the reins, rather than in the traces.
Difference is Obama will send them the money. Spreading the wealth is a good thing. And remember Kissinger already said Obama is being groomed to be installed as World Leader.
Barry will be a gelding after 2010.
As far as I know the Constitution is the Supreme Law of Land and even treaties cannot trump it’s provisions.
The preamble even state the Constitution is made for the people.
HOLY-MOLY AMEN TO THIS GUY!
You may be surprised to learn that there is plenty of precedent that treaties do indeed trump the Constitution as formal obligations of the Nation. I think that is crap, but still, it is out there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.