Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/12/2009 5:23:15 AM PDT by Corky Boyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Corky Boyd

One would be remiss to dismiss the fact Iran is already a nuclear power.

All this speculation is just another way to stall the inevitable.


2 posted on 10/12/2009 5:29:14 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Corky Boyd
Can they actually put a 1600 pound payload on the puny missiles they have launched so far? I don't think so. They could try to deliver a gun device by air, but to me it sounds like deploying such a weapon would constitute a Cleave Little defense posture.
3 posted on 10/12/2009 5:49:26 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The People have abdicated our duties; ... and anxiously hope for just two things: bread and circuses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Corky Boyd

This is silly. If the USA could develop a nuclear weapon in about 6 years with no help from outsiders it is wrong to conclude that Iran could do it in more time with outside help.


5 posted on 10/12/2009 6:10:42 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Corky Boyd

Let’s not overlook that possessing nukes give a theocracy that thinks well of suicide bombs the means to build a doomsday device. “Attack us and everyone dies” would put Iran in a pretty strong strategic position without any need for a delivery system at all.


6 posted on 10/12/2009 7:28:31 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Corky Boyd

This is a well considered analysis that is hard to dispute. In systematically acquiring the nuclear infrastructure needed to make a bomb, Iran must be ready to defeat potential international pressure and prevent a preemptive attack. This leads to a requirement that Iran must be ready with a timely sudden “breakout” build of a handful of completed weapons. A gun type bomb is well suited to this strategy. Once Iran lets it be known that they have a weapon, any coalition against it can be broken up by selective pressure and threats.


7 posted on 10/12/2009 7:50:38 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Corky Boyd

I am convinced Iran has had a nuclear device in some form for over a year now, unlike the NORKs Iran does not want to fire one off because any nuclear device detonated is immediately analyzed and can be dissected to what the yield, efficiency and where the uranium came from.

Iran does not want to use it as a propaganda tool like North Korea, they just want to USE it against Israel or anything of a high value American target. if anything and the Iranians are very very good craftsmen are making smaller portable copies of at the least several dozen “back-pack” versions and most likely plan a coordinated attack upon America at a strategic vulnerable point where down range fallout is maximized.


9 posted on 10/12/2009 8:15:20 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson