[Deepest End]

Latest from Leo Donofrio

[Former MSM Viewer]

interpret please

most here are not legal experts

[papasmurf]

I’m not an attorney. But my take is that all legal actions questioning the Constitutionality of 0bama holding office, must come from the Government itself on behalf of the public interest.

Is that correct?

[knarf]

I read that twice, and it sounds to me like .. a private citizen cannot bring suit against a gov’t. official .. and especially unless and untill a couple of “approved” definitions are determined.

[wintertime]

Sorry,...I didn’t understand a single word of your post. It is English but what does it mean?

[Zman]

I am not an attorney either; my understanding is that an entity must have “standing” to sue; for example, any citizen cannot sue bambi because they cannot show actual harm. But,Alan Keyes can sue: he was running for president and can pointedly show that he was damaged by someone who may be ineligible.

Also, the federal government, in some instances, has to agree, in advance, to be sued by a party.

Any attorneys out there that can set me straight if I am incorrect in my interpretations?

[Chief_Cabioch]

The Writ of Quo Warranto as I read it, can be filed and served by a legal process server, Sheriff, US Marshal or other Officer of the court, and if the Court refuses to hear the case the respondent MUST vacate the office, the proceeding is simple, yet government officials will try and ignore it, as usual, yet according to this link, the local Sheriff, and local Militia can remove him by force if the court either refuses the case, or the respondent doesn’t provide enough proof he is eligible for the position in question the founding fathers put this provisionJUST for these purposes , to remove a usurper, and Tyrant, in the first paragraph, the founding father also gave us an easy way to remove bad Judges, as ALL Federal Judges are “appointed for Periods of Good behavior”./.....not LIFE

http://www.constitution.org/writ/quo_warranto.htm