Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Latest from Leo Donofrio
1 posted on 10/11/2009 9:36:29 AM PDT by Deepest End
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Deepest End

interpret please

most here are not legal experts


2 posted on 10/11/2009 9:42:44 AM PDT by Former MSM Viewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deepest End

I’m not an attorney. But my take is that all legal actions questioning the Constitutionality of 0bama holding office, must come from the Government itself on behalf of the public interest.

Is that correct?


4 posted on 10/11/2009 9:45:27 AM PDT by papasmurf (RnVjayB5b3UsIDBiYW1hLCB5b3UgcGllY2Ugb2Ygc2hpdCBjb3dhcmQh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deepest End

I read that twice, and it sounds to me like .. a private citizen cannot bring suit against a gov’t. official .. and especially unless and untill a couple of “approved” definitions are determined.


5 posted on 10/11/2009 9:46:10 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deepest End

Sorry,...I didn’t understand a single word of your post. It is English but what does it mean?


6 posted on 10/11/2009 9:48:43 AM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deepest End
I am not an attorney either; my understanding is that an entity must have “standing” to sue; for example, any citizen cannot sue bambi because they cannot show actual harm. But,Alan Keyes can sue: he was running for president and can pointedly show that he was damaged by someone who may be ineligible.

Also, the federal government, in some instances, has to agree, in advance, to be sued by a party.

Any attorneys out there that can set me straight if I am incorrect in my interpretations?

21 posted on 10/11/2009 11:04:52 AM PDT by Zman (Liberals: denying reality since Day One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Deepest End

The Writ of Quo Warranto as I read it, can be filed and served by a legal process server, Sheriff, US Marshal or other Officer of the court, and if the Court refuses to hear the case the respondent MUST vacate the office, the proceeding is simple, yet government officials will try and ignore it, as usual, yet according to this link, the local Sheriff, and local Militia can remove him by force if the court either refuses the case, or the respondent doesn’t provide enough proof he is eligible for the position in question the founding fathers put this provisionJUST for these purposes , to remove a usurper, and Tyrant, in the first paragraph, the founding father also gave us an easy way to remove bad Judges, as ALL Federal Judges are “appointed for Periods of Good behavior”./.....not LIFE

http://www.constitution.org/writ/quo_warranto.htm


68 posted on 01/17/2016 11:21:44 PM PST by Chief_Cabioch (usurper, tyrant, obama, constitution, quo warranto, 9th Amendment, Article 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson