Posted on 10/07/2009 9:29:54 AM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
This morning, it dawned on me that I wasn’t aware of any previous UIPA requests to the DoH for the actual records which contributed to the DoH declaration that President Obama’s birth had been filed by the DoH Registrar on August 8, 1961.
How could a birth have been”FILED” on “August 8, 1961″ for President Obama with the DoH “REGISTRAR” without the Registrar having been informed that he was born?
That’s not possible. Not unless clairvoyance was officially recognized by the DoH in 1961. (More secret law?)
In order for the DoH Registrar to have filed President Obama’s birth on August 8, 1961 there must be a record that came into existence no later than August 9, 1961. (I use that date to make up for any issues regarding time zone differences.)
So, I have just sent the following UIPA request to Hawaii Department of Health Director Fukino.
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 8:24 AM From: [Leo C. Donofrio - email redacted] To: chiyome.fukino@doh.hawaii.gov cc: janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov Subject: UIPA Request #5 From Leo C. Donofrio
Dear Department of Health Director Fukino,
The following request for Government records is made pursuant to the UIPA:
I request to inspect and copy the record (or records) which contributed to the decision of the Hawaii Department of Health (hereinafter DoH) to have indicated that President Obama’s birth had been filed by the DoH registrar on August 8, 1961.
President Obama has made public a “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB) which he alleges is an official document printed by the Hawaii DoH. That document bears the following:
“DATE FILED BY REGISTRAR August 8, 1961″.
Various public statements made by the DoH have given the appearance of authenticating that COLB as a genuine record originally generated by the DoH.
In this, my 5th UIPA request sent to your office, please understand that I am requesting access to all records maintained by the DoH which caused President Obama’s birth to have been filed with the registrar back on August 8, 1961. Therefore, for purposes of this – UIPA request #5 – I am only requesting to inspect (and copy) records (or official copies thereof) which originally came into existence no later than August 9, 1961.
This request is not for the COLB in question as I have previously requested that record in a separate UIPA request (UIPA Request #3) forwarded to your office by myself on September 29, 2009.
Please have your response conform to the OIP administrative rules. If you do maintain a record (or records) which came into existence prior to August 10, 1961 which contributed to the DoH declaration that President Obama’s birth had been “FILED BY REGISTRAR” on “August 8, 1961″ and you intend to deny access thereto, please make sure your response states that you are denying access. If you do not maintain any such records, you are required by the OIP administrative rules to inform me that you do not maintain any such records.
I would prefer to inspect these records in person. If you intend to send me official copies of the records requested herein, I prefer electronic copies sent by email to [email redacted].
Very Truly Yours,
Leo C. Donofrio, Citizen Attorney
That a COLB has been presented to the nation by President Obama wherein his birth appears to have been filed by the DoH Registrar on August 8, 1961 could not be more public at this point.
And the DoH has given the appearance of authenticating this document. Such authentication has been relied upon by various courts and persons in the Senate and Congress. Therefore, absolutely no privacy protection is available to President Obama as to this information.
Should the requested records also contain information which has not been made public and to which a privacy interest still exists, that information can be redacted.
The law supports my request. The law is rational in that way. The strange behavior by the DoH is irrational.
If the DoH has such a record they must either grant access thereto or deny access. On the other hand, if the DoH does not maintain such a record, then – according to the OIP administrative rules, as well as the multiple statements of OIP Staff Attorney Linden Joesting – the DoH must tell me if they do not maintain such a record.
If the DoH does not maintain such a record, then they do not maintain sufficient evidence that President Obama’s birth was genuinely filed by the DoH Registrar on August 8, 1961. This would bring us back to square 1.
(For more relevant discussion about the “Filed By Registrar” issue, please see the original June 24, 2008 report by Israeli Insider as well as TerriK’s latest in depth analysis.)
Leo C. Donofrio, Citizen Attorney http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com
When you control the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of any government the law becomes whatever you want it to be. Unfortunately that's the case here.
When you control the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of any government the law becomes whatever you want it to be. Unfortunately that’s the case here.
Your right Leo.
Unfortunately, Lingle, Okubo, Fukino and the Attorney General are ALL in on this cover-up.
Seems like the ONLY ethical State official is the Senator, who, in an interview with WND, stated that all birth records in HI should be made public.
Leo is an indescribable attribute and patriot and we are glad to have him on our side !
Fukino, per HI statutes, has 10 days to deliver the goods or inform him that the records do not exist. If they pull the “tangible interest” bull, then he’ll have to deal with the OIP, which we “HOPE” will work FINALLY ! ! !
Interesting. If no records exist prior to that date of Aug 9, that will be a problem.
This will be interesting —
Sweet. Great idea.
Didn't know that. That's good news. Maybe there is some hope that the HI authorities will move on this.
Unfortunately, Lingle, Okubo, Fukino and the Attorney General are ALL in on this cover-up.
Seems like the ONLY ethical State official is the Senator, who, in and interview with WND, stated that all birth records in HI should be made public.
Leo is an indescribable attribute and patriot and we glad to have him on our side !
Fukino, per HI statutes, has 10 days to deliver the goods or inform him that the records do not exist. If they pull the “tangible interest” bull, then he’ll have to deal wit the OIP, which we “HOPE” will work FINALLY ! ! !
There is such a simple solution to untangle all of this legal spaghetti. Just release the records.
Didn’t know that. That’s good news. Maybe there is some hope that the HI authorities will move on this.
Unfortuanely, you’re probably right.
They will most likely fight with the petitioner and he will have to bring a legal suit against them, which could take FOREVER with motions to dismiss, appeals, etc.
By law, the State HAS TO comply, but when the Usurper is involved, there is no adherence to LAW - it’s the Chicago Thugs mentality.
Shouldn’t the ten days be up on Requests # 1 and 2 by now?
“(UIPA Request #3) forwarded to your office by myself on September 29, 2009.”
The tenth day on Request # 3 is tomorrow.
Yes, I think you’re right about that. However, Miss Tickly wrote me and said she has a very strong case and that she
would be afforded expedited due process. That was about 3 weeks ago.
Leo summed it up when he said “Now, to get the State to follow their own laws...” !
To the best of my knowledge, the ONLY document the State issued was the “bride and groom” index data for Stanley Ann and Barack Sr....
Petitioner actually requested Barack Jr ONLY and Ms. Okubo said she ‘misunderstood’ the request !
That was two days ago and we still don’t know if she ever fulfilled the correct request yet ? My guess is “no” !
They will only incriminate themselves if they actually release the records reequested. They are better off avoiding the requests and inviting a lawsuit, which could take FOREVER to settle ! ARRRGGHHHHHH! ! ! ! ! ! !
Today is the ninth day for Leo’s request #3. Do you know if requests 1 & 2 were submitted the day before ? I don’t see where he indicated that anywhere.
His updates are sporadic, but then again, he probably has a pretty full plate.
If we knew exactly when these were submitted, we could write the OIP and request that they ENFORCE the 10 day period and NOT permit the intenional misconduct to perpetuate at the DoH !
NB, For whatever it’s worth, I submitted this to OIP today
10/08/2009
Dear Atty. Linden Joesting,
I sent you an inquiry yesterday regarding the misconduct of two individuals employed at DoH in Hawaii, namely Ms. Fukino and Ms. Okubo.
It has come to my attention today that Attorney Leo Donofrio has submitted five UIPA requests during the last week of September to Ms. Fukino (cc to Ms. Okubo) regarding access to State maintained records of registrant Barack Obama II.
Mr. Donofrio is a licensed attorney in NJ and has conducted exhaustive research on the UIPA manual as well as pertinent Hawaiian Laws and Statutes regarding public access to records maintained by the State of HI. There is absolutely no doubt that all of Mr. Donofrio’s requests are in total conformity to the State Laws of HI.
It is the obligation of your department to insure adherence to UIPA guidelines regarding the issuance of such requests. Consequently, if Mr. Donofrio’s requests are not provided within the mandatory ten day period by Ms. Fukino and/or Ms. Okubo, they would be guilty of failure to fulfill said requests and potentially constitute an indictment of intentional and willful malfeasance.
It is to be noted that additional requests to the Health Department for the release of records regarding the aforementioned registrant were also submitted within the last 14 days.
If it is discovered that other requests for records are being made available over the counter or within the mandatory ten day period and the two aforementioned employees are ‘intentionally and willfully’ withholding information that is due upon request to the petitioner regarding said registrant, then both Ms. Fukino and Ms. Okubo are guilty of pre-meditated and willful bias and discrimination toward the requestor as well as unlawful favoritism toward the registrant. State employees cannot be allowed to exhibit ANY bias or favoritism whatsoever in properly fulfilling their job titles and such intentional bias cannot be permitted to perpetuate at the State level.
A charge of willful and intentional malfeasance on the part of these employees is an extremely serious matter and could endanger their ability to satisfactorily maintain their position on the Hawaiian payroll as State employees.
With all due respect to your position, I am requesting that you fulfill your responsibility in insuring that the State Laws are strictly adhered to in this matter. This notice is hereby served to you this day, 10/08/2009, as a matter of public record to your department to insure that Mr. Donofrio and the additional requests regarding said registrant are met, without delay, to satisfy the ten day deadline as unequivocally stated in the UIPA manual.
Thank you so much for your consideration in this matter.
Respectfully Submitted,
Great Job
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.