Posted on 10/07/2009 7:11:45 AM PDT by Beloved Levinite
Jeffry John Aufderheide VacTRUTH 09/11/09
(*** EDITORS NOTE: THIS JUST IN, FDA APPROVES SWINE VACCINE PRIOR TO CHILDREN SAFETY STUDY BEGINNING!!!! SEE ARTICLE HERE. )
See for yourself the study presented at the end of article. Please spread the word and make this go viral… no pun intended. Kindly reference and link to VacTRUTH!
(vactruth.com) Trials for the experimental H1N1 Swine flu vaccine commence Tuesday, September 15th in Thornton, Colorado. Novartis, a bio-pharmaceutical company that manufactures the vaccine, is recommending that children participating in the trial receive two doses of an experimental vaccine which contain ingredients found in spermicides, cleaners, and cosmetics along with thimerosal and squalene (MF59). Everyone should have a sense of concern as the only safety checks for these children are a few blood draws and follow-up phone calls. No neurological testing. No kidding.
Official opinions from federal agencies, such as the CDC, insist that the new vaccine will be safe and effective. Experts say we can trust the new H1N1 experimental vaccine because the technology used to create the vaccine is time tested. Experts argue that the only variable changing from the ‘normal’ flu vaccine and the H1N1 experimental vaccine is the novel A/H1N1 antigen. In other words, the same vaccine ‘technology’ is used but with the new virus.
However, this is the furthest thing from the actual TRUTH. As will be demonstrated, the following information was obtained through enrolling a family member into the study to gain an understanding as to what the ingredients would be. After finding out the the information I am about to share, enrollment in this trial has been canceled.
(Excerpt) Read more at vactruth.com ...
This kind of crap has been talked about and shown to be a fraud before.
Look, I was initially concerned before, but not anymore.
It’s the same vaccine, just with a different variant of the virus.
The regular flu vaccine is fine and so is this.
I guzzled that stuff and still got sicker than a dog once.
I believe there is some benefits to using it, but it’s NOT the cure-all its touted to be online.
golly....show me actual proof that this is some manufactured thing.
The problem is, there is none in it.
Yep, that’s right. As far as AIDS goes, you would have to ask an AIDS sufferer. However, it has worked for me for years, but enjoy your chemical cocktail, lemming.
Can you point us to a link to confirm this? It would be most helpful....
CA....
I thought anything from VAC Truth was moderated to the circular file?
Some years ago, when my kids were little, we were in the pediatrician’s office and he was about to give my daughter an oral polio vaccine and I commented that I would probably need to get my wife vaccinated too. At that moment he paused and said that he couldn’t give the vaccine until several weeks after my wife got a polio shot, because there would be a danger to my wife from the oral vaccine given to our daughter.
Patients given weakened oral polio vaccines shed viruses can infect people who do not have immunity. In the USA virtually everyone has had polio shots or oral vaccines and there aren’t that many people who haven’t had any vaccine, so it’s not a problem. My wife, foreign born and raised, never had any childhood immunizations (she does now).
So we went and got my wife immunized and then were cleared for the vaccines for my daughter.
I wonder how this H1N1 oral vaccine works. If it follows the normal route of oral weakened virus systems, will the vaccinated person be giving H1N1 to all their friends?
Totally agree with your post.
Vaccines have proven successful in eradicating many diseases and staving off others.
The Piggly Wiggly vaccine was not rushed into production. We had the swine flu in 1976 and a vaccine for it. However, there more people suffered from the side effects of the vaccine itself, than died from the swine flu itself.
The current version of vaccine has not been rushed so much as it has been repackaged, with production ramping up to meet the flu season.
There have been no human trials to test for efficacy and the percentage of expected relief.
There have been no human trials to determine what the side effects are and what the expected census numbers might be for each side effect.
Further, the state of Washington has approved the use of mercury as a transmitting medium. What are the side effects of injecting a human with mercury? How many children will come down with autism as a result?
To compound all this Tom Foolery many state departments of health are issuing statements of caution regarding the severity of the flu.
The State of Idaho issued a statement that, in effect, said the swine may not be any more virulent than any other strain, of which there as many as 15 each flu season. They further stated that studies have shown that swine flu is milder than previously thought and that most victims will recover faster than if they had other strains.
To compound all this I am reposting the following, which I posted last week:
Really? Really? Read it? Oh aren’t you clever. How about sitting across from someone who has told me the story plenty of times. Yeah, she is 99 and 4 months. I have heard it all and from her sister.
There is no reason to take the shot. NONE.
You are being scammed by the drug companies.
Let’s get some things real clear about some things. They have been indemnified by the government from any and all law suits. If their drug causes injury to you and your loved one, are you willing to forgo your right to sue for injury or death? You don’t care? Oh! Hey it is your life, but you should know they have not done any trials to measure efficacy rates or percentage of expected side effects or what those side effects will be.
In fact, the swine flu is not new, as you know. However, are you aware of the swine flu of 1976 and the complications from that little fiasco? Well more people came down with Gulliane Barr Syndrome than got sick with the swine flu.
Hope it doesn’t happen to you or your family but who knows.
The drug companies have done no testing and you won’t find out until aferward. Now check this. The drug companies are so smart and have done so much testing, They cannot figure out if you eed 1 shot, 2 shots or 3 shots.
Yep, at first they were saying a single dose will suffice. Well, since they are indemnified why not say “you may require a booster shot” to ensure the effectiveness. Now for the last three weeks they have been saying “You may require 3 shots”. Why?
Hell there is money in this and as far as the company is concerned it is free money. They cannot be sued and this is a zero/no risk opportunity for the executives and shareholders. Oh and if that weren’t enough, there are so many doctors and Secretaries of Health saying in effect:
“The swine flu is not as virulent as first thought. In fact, the effects are milder than other strains of the flu and recovery seems to be quicker” (Idaho Department of Health)sic.
I can’t find the draft of another post with the quotes from authorities but when I do I will compile them into a new post. Finally, the following videos demonstrate that we are, in fact, repeating history and it is a pointed reminder of what a scam the Swine Flu is.
It is not new and many people took vaccinations for it in the Mid 70’s. There were many who suffered terribly.
The Current scam for immunization by the Drug Companies
exempts them from lawsuit.
Why? No human trials have been done to determine efficacy or mortality rates.
Watch the first video. It is only 3 minutes long and will leave you informed about your plan and choices should this “Pandemic” actually appear.
Ten Things Your Not Supposed to know about the Swine Flu Vaccine (Operation Kill-Shot)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUEIls5Ncf0&feature=related
60 minutes - SWINE FLU VACCINE WARNING - Part I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lcJt4jX1Vo
60 minutes - SWINE FLU VACCINE WARNING - Part II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4c9Is1T3z4&feature=related
As an aside I spent 10 days in Mexico and it sucked having the entire country shut down but, believe me, I shook every hombres hand and hugged the Senoritas(cuz I like em’).
Know what? I know at least 100 people that live down there year round and the only thing any one caught was fish. The flu can be can kill and good hygiene is your friend. But being forced to take an injection against your will and indemnifying the producers?
F-That.
How do you know that there is no squalene in the MF59 ?
This vaccine will sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids.
yes, i have seen it
LOL! That was my first thought! It is written in that breathless tone, that immediately started tweaking my BS Meter.
I just did extensive research on the CDC site on the possibility of adjuvants in the H1N1 vaccine, since this is the issue that concerns me the most.
It concerns me because it is widely acknowledged that adjuvants in feline vaccines have induced an epidemic of hyperthyroidism and injection-site sarcomas in cats. As a consequence, I no longer vaccinate my cats, which are mostly indoors anyway, unless there is a specific threat in my neighborhood. Mass vaccinations are mainly to protect the general population and not the specific animal anyway. Furthermore, I use only adjuvant-free (Purevax) vaccines.
Considering I have serious immune system problems already, I was horrified to read the rumors of adjuvants in the H1N1 vaccine. However, upon investigation, I discovered that none of these rumor-mongering sites are credible in general, most being of the tin-foil-hat variety. Furthermore, extensive research on the CDC's H1N1 page by searching for "h1n1 adjuvants" shows that no FDA-licensed H1N1 vaccine in the U.S. currently contains adjuvants, nor has any U.S. FDA-approved influenza vaccine ever contained an adjuvant. Influenza vaccines can contain adjuvants only if the Emergency Use Authorization act is invoked in the case of an unexpected pandemic. The purpose of adding adjuvants at this point would be to stretch a limited supply of vaccine and/or to make existing vaccines more potent against its target if existing vaccines were not working well because of mutations or other reasons.
Also, the intranasal vaccine, which is single dose, does not contain thimerosal, and single-dose injections free from thimerosal will also be available. So from an adjuvant perspective, the U.S. H1N1 vaccines are safe, and single-dose vaccines can be obtained without mercury-based preservatives. While no mercury is good in the human body, just keep in mind that the University of Rochester reports that a tuna fish sandwich contains more mercury than a vaccine. Quite frankly, I would be more concerned about aduvants, which indeed are contained in several childhood vaccines.
Yes. Recipients of the nasal spray vaccine will shed the virus for up to seven days, thus possibly transmitting the virus to anyone in contact.
Naturally, no one who receives the nasal spray vaccine will be ‘isolated’ for the seven days that they will be shedding the virus, so they will possibly be giving it to anyone around them who would not normally be exposed to it.
Apparently the injected vaccine doesn’t do the same thing. It will just damage the person injected.
http://freedomforall.net/russell-l-blaylock-m-d-take-d3-not-the-swine-flu-vaccine/
Dr. Russell Blaylock says DO NOT TAKE THE VACCINE which is more dangerous than the flu itself and suggests taking 5000 IU of Vitamin D3 now and 15,000 IU when it starts to spread.
http://www.newsmax.com/health/vaccine_swine_flu/2009/07/07/232717.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.