Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Neidermeyer
Do you see on the Divorce records that Stanley referred to this at all as a reason for the divorce?

That's a good point, she wouldn't have needed to get a divorce if she could have shown that he was already married. She'd need some sort of lawsuit though if she wanted to get any child support. But, in the event, she didn't ask for any in the divorce, nor any alimony.

Does anyone who read the divorce papers recall what the grounds were? I'm thinking it was "mental cruelty" or some other fairly innoucuous (for the time) grounds.

77 posted on 10/02/2009 2:23:06 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

Nor did she do so with Lolo...which should raise a red flag, In additon, Barry wasn’t named in Lolo’s divorce..which should also raise a red flag..why didn’t she want his AKA at the time known?


81 posted on 10/02/2009 2:26:45 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson