Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: thouworm

not off the top of my head..I think you can see the info in the link on my profile..basically ...marriage not valid..but the law was enacted long after Jr was born.


226 posted on 10/03/2009 10:47:59 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

will check; asking because I think there might be (unconfirmed) evidence that BHO, Sr married third wife Ruth in 1964 in Mass.

If so, it might explain the necessity for the divorce, which became final in Mar 1964 (assuming BHO, Sr & Stanley Ann were married).

BHO, Sr and Ruth’s son, Mark, was born in 1964.

Also, according to “Dreams,” Mark was the uncontested heir to BHO’s Sr’s estate because none of the other children could prove their legal claim to be his offspring. Mark had all the necessary documents.

Ruth says she was married about 7 yrs to BHO, Sr. They might have divorced in 1971. Wondered if that might have had anything to do with the law you are citing (rather than the abuse) & also BHO Sr’s trip to the US that year.

Much speculation here, and even if true, does it tie in anywhere to the subject of our focus.


229 posted on 10/03/2009 11:07:02 AM PDT by thouworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson