Also the levels of CO2 are so dilute that their effect is negligible.
“To believe that CO2 levels can affect Earth’s temperature you must believe in Dilution homeopathy. “
And you can quote me on that.
I greatly admire Steve McIntyre’s work.
But he is a statistician, and uses his statistical skills to kill the AGW argument. If you consider statistics to be a science, then he is a scientist.
Go to http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7168 and read comment #10. It gives a brief history of the “hockey stick” and how it was deconstructed. Someone needs to go to prison for fraud.
“CO2 is NOT warming the planet.”
How inconvenient.
bttt
For a long time I’ve thought they’ve been cookin’ the books with bad statistical analyses.
I placed a bttt on this thread for a later read. I had hoped to send this to my Grobal Warming beliver friends!
Then I just read it!
What total horseshit writing!
Chart #1 talks about the IPCC (what is that) then charts the Schweingruber Variation on one line and the Acrhive on the other line. What are these? The writer never tells us what these variables mean.
Then on to Chart #2 This charts the Raw vs. the USCHN. What the hell is raw or USCHN?
Finally Chart #3 presents the Schweingruber Variation merged to the CRU Archive. Merged unidentified garbage to unidentified garbage. So what?
I wish someone except AlGore could tell us why there is “Global Warming”, or lack thereof, but this article certainly ain’t doin’ it!!
If you look at the RICO Act “Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act” link here
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/content/rico-act.html
Those that have falsified the data fall most definitely under the act and could be prosecuted by an honest and non political Justice Department.
These “scientists” have falsified data in collusion with other scientists. They have reaped financial reward. This is without any doubt subject to RICO.
President Cruz or Trump will appoint an honest and aggressive attorney general.