Posted on 09/24/2009 7:06:36 AM PDT by Danae
INTRODUCTION
The entire Presidential eligibility movement has been ridiculed as a fringe “conspiracy theory” by main stream media, members of Congress and even Judges speaking directly from the bench. This ridicule is largely due to public statements made by Hawaii Department of Health Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino (see below) which testify that she has seen vital records maintained by her office which prove President Obama was born in Hawaii and that he has an original birth certificate on file there.
The ridicule has been broad, extending even to public investigators like myself who believe that President Obama was actually born in Hawaii. But reliance on Director Fukino and her Communications Director Janice Akubo are sadly misplaced. They are guilty of misdirecting the public away from vital records information made expressly available by statute where no privacy exceptions apply.
These accusations are not a matter of conjecture. They are a matter of fact and shall be proved. This, Part 1 of the full report, will illustrate multiple instances of misdirection.
Following reports in the days ahead will detail various information requests made by TerriK and their eventual resolution. The resolution involves official responses which – according to statutory application – admit the existence of amendments and/or corrections to President Obama’s vital records despite the continuing pattern of misdirection.
BACKGROUND
The state of Hawaii enacted the Uniform Information Practices Act (UIPA) as a means by which the public may have free and open access to all information maintained by the Government. While some information is obviously restricted to protect the privacy of individuals, the intent of the statute is clear; to help the public access government held information.
(Excerpt) Read more at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
More like a massive fissure. And yea, Things are going to begin to happen. This hole goes deeper yet.
bttt
bttt
The fact that amendments have been made to the vital records is undeniable now. But we knew that had to be anyway, since Lolo Soetoro adopted Barry and made hima an Indonesian citizen as a child.
What may be revealed by just knowing when and what type of amendments were made, and by whom? Well, if Barry Soetoro --as he was legally in 1980 when his mother file divorce peladings with the state of Hawaii to divorce Lolo Soetoro-- remained Barry Soetoro legally while applying for passport and or college entry and tuition assistance, then Barry Soeotor forfeited his eligiblity to be defined as a natural born American citizen and has clealry defrauded the Ameircan people by cliaming he was eligible when he knew he was not. ALSO, none of the exhibits he has tried to claim as legitimate CoLBs have stamped on them 'Amended', and if any amendments were made to his vital rec ords prior to June 2007, then the exhibits are clearly fraudulent and he has committed criminal fraud for gain.
pingaling
What I would like to know is this, what is the relationship between Indonesia and Britain?
Obama Sr. was a British citizen. When Kenya became a commonwealth, he became not just a kenyan, but also a British citizen.
If you follow that logic, Obama jr, at Birth, was British and American, assuming he was born in the islands. If he was not born in the islands, he is British.
Lets assume for a moment that He was born in Hawaii, His adoption by Lolo to get Indonesian Citizenship, that would have had ramifications between both British and US Citizenship status.
Is it possible that upon his return to the US, that his status as a British citizen, would have interfered with regaining his US Citizenship status? I think it would have, given that he could NOT ever get Status as a NBC while also the citizen of another nation, in this case Great Britain. Upon his return, by two different requirements for Natural Born Citizenship, Obama cannot be considered an NBC.
Is it just that simple?
*bump*
bttt
From Leo on the story we are discussing:
“It’s quite amazing, but OIP Opinion Letter 07-07 clearly indicates that once information contained in a vital record is exposed, the person no longer has a privacy interest in the exposed information. And therefore, the relevant original vital records should be made public in redacted form when disclosure of the relevant information is mandatory according to statute – in this case more than one, specifically the UIPA at 92F-12(15) and Haw. Rev. Stat. 338-18(d).”
So is his Long Form BC exposed or just the changes to it? Can they redact certain things with a black marker?
A poster on Leo’s site when he posted the day before yesterday thread suggested that:
O went to grandma’s deathbed to be told that daddy was not daday. It could be daddy was Frank Davis or daddy was unknown.
My thoughts:
So if he was born in Kenya then he still could be NBC. The Occidential records showing indonesian citizenship would be waved away as claims of ignorance or poverty or he was not sure if he was American or what. i.e. he makes himself the victim, etc etc.
[Ed. If he only had one record on file then she would have said she viewed that record, not records (plural). regardless, they responded to the UIPA requests and under the statute their replies indicate that they have amendments and/or corrections on file. more to come.]
Thats from Leo.
I wonder what corrections they made. Leo would not have mentioned that if not for specific reason. A correction regarding immigration status perhaps? WHOLEY CRAP...
I get it now. When Barry came back, in the process of getting US Status back, his father’s British citizenship status would have been mentioned. I bet that Barrys Hawaiian records indicate that Barry had British and US Citizenship. Thats what Barry is hiding.
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
I cannot tell if just the alteration can be made public or the whole file now. I think Leo is saying that once the record was changed then the whole file can be made public.
I worry the changes were due to granny making a deathbed confession to O about who daddy was. i.e. a scam to “whitewash” (oh that’s racist) the records.
The simplest answer is most likely correct. His records show he is of US and British Nationality. And has information regarding his return to the US from Indonesia I am betting.
Just proving there have been amendments will prove Obama’s exhibits at his website and factcheck.org are frauds because none of his displayed CoLB exhibts (I refuse to call them documents) have the word ‘Amended’ on the face as required by law when the vital records have been amended! Just proving there have been amendings proves he’s a lying fraud who defrauded the world to rise to power.
Also it all depends on how he got entrance to the U.S. again and what "papers" were used to get through the door???
He was four when he left and ten when returned!!!
Since Leo believes the usurper IS born in Hawaii, I have a feeling that he is looking at something else beside the BC that he has not shared with us yet???
Obama is the Queen.
Can someone PLEASE suggest to Leo to change his web design ?
Reading white on black is difficult for many.
What is on the site is extremely important but having to read the white type set is frustrating and VERY unconventional !
Not to mention which ones he used to go to Punahoe with. He would have had to provide those to get a scholarship and go to school.
Hawaii is a BIG linchpin.
I think he was born there, but he is not an NBC because his DAD was BRITISH. Can’t be a NBC with a British National for a daddy.
I find it rather refreshing. My eyes get tired from all the white backed light off of regular sites.
That being said, you might be able to change the settings you see for yourself, not sure tho
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.