Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RobinMasters
Interesting in how this TerryK approached this.

"This was not originally an action to reveal his actual BC and personal vital records info...the original requests (by TerrK) were for records pertaining to whether he requested his file for the purpose of amending and whether he did amend... the actual contents of his personal vital records are protected, she wasn't asking to see those. She was asking whether he paid any fees to amend them and whether they had been amended... not the contents of the amendments.

"However, I am going to raise the issue that since Fukino made a public statement about his place of birth, then all records viewed by her for the purposes of making that statement are supposed to be made public under 92F-12(15), information required to be made public. Regardless, the other statement she made about him being a natural born citizen involves a whole other can of worms concerning the advice of the Attorney General and it is the AG opinion letter that we are really after and which was denied to TerriK. The statutory and case law indicates that this information MUST be made public. That means we should get an answer as to what definition of nbc Fukino used to make that statement."

5 posted on 09/22/2009 3:56:02 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red_Devil 232

Is there a list of what Obama HASN’T locked away?


7 posted on 09/22/2009 4:28:56 PM PDT by tbw2 (Freeper sci-fi - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Red_Devil 232

I heard the audio when the Gov made the statement. IIRC. I could be wrong....played it 3 times, she never said Zero had an original Hawaiian BC....just she had seen the BC.


10 posted on 09/22/2009 4:34:58 PM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Red_Devil 232

I believe the issue is whether the original records can be viewed as having been collected or gathered for the purpose of making the public statement. Obviously, they were not. Fukino states she reviewed Obama’s documents in Obama’s file. Is it fair to say that she gathered and collected those documents for the purpose of making the public statement. I am not so certain that her activities would be described as such.

I believe that Fukino made the statement that Obama was a ‘natural born citizen’ on the basis of Pelosi’s sworn certification representing that he was Constitutionally qualifed to be president.


13 posted on 09/22/2009 4:40:31 PM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Red_Devil 232
However, I am going to raise the issue that since Fukino made a public statement about his place of birth, then all records viewed by her for the purposes of making that statement are supposed to be made public under 92F-12(15), information required to be made public.

Terri and Leo need all the records, not just the ones supposedly viewed by her in order to make that public statement. They also need the documents that she ignored, set aside, and buried back into the file that would have led to a different public statement. Unless all the records are opened, there could be a selective release of documents that had been amended to Obama's favor.

53 posted on 09/24/2009 4:45:36 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson