Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

Show me the exact quote in a Supreme Court case as law of the land that you are using to come to that conclusion.


334 posted on 09/22/2009 1:48:40 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick
There is none, specifically addressing a question to the court regarding the question of NBC for the purposes of POTUS eligibility.

Which is why I referred to that, up above in #302.

What I'm using to come to that conclusion is a combination of things, including (but not limited to):
1) Citizens are not the same thing as Subjects
2) Law of Nations give a definition for NBC
3) The framers and founder relied on Vattel's work (i.e. Natural Law) for both the Deceleration of Independence & the Constitution
4) John Jay's letter to Washington (the president of the Constitutional Convention) pre-dating the first appearance (in their draft's) of the NBC requirement
5) Someone born with dual citizenship (or more) has allegiance at birth to a foreign government/entity
6)The NBC requirement for POTUS & Commander in Chief of the military, goes "beyond" the "simple" requirement of only citizen for all other government positions referred to in the Constitution
7)The "mindset" of the framers having just won, against most odds, a bloody and costly war, "grandfathered" themselves past the requirement of NBC due to their sacrifice and the fact that the first eligible NBC would not have been possible until 1811.

etc.

343 posted on 09/22/2009 2:05:23 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson