Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

Are you referring to this:

“2.2.4 Polygamous marriages
2.2.4.1 The courts did not have jurisdiction to grant a decree of
nullity in respect of polygamous [the term includes
potentially polygamous] marriages until 29 June 1972,
when the Matrimonial Proceedings (Polygamous
Marriages) Act 1972 was enacted. However, the effect
of this Act is to allow the courts to exercise jurisdiction in respect of any polygamous marriage, irrespective of the
date on which it was contracted.”

I know there is more, I read it. However, that would be for a UK court to decide, and clearly that hasn’t happened. There is a Divorce Decree in Hawaii that would likely make this a very sticky issue in UK, and it would require documentation that Obama Sr. Was officially legally already married in Kenya. I have not the foggiest idea if that is provable or not. No clue.

Now that being said, unless it were adjudicated in UK, I think it safe to say that that issue has not been dealt with, and would be up to UK to decide if he were British or not based on the issue of Polygamy. I am pretty sure Obama would like to avoid THAT particular trial, because again it would require the release of his birth documents, and require discovery, which is the ultimate point of all of this.

I don’t care where Obama was born, I don’t care who his parents are or if they were white pink yellow green magenta or blue. I want to know if he is constitutionally eligible for POTUS and there is only one way to find out. FORCE DISCOVERY.

Thats the goal here, FORCE DISCOVERY.


120 posted on 09/21/2009 7:40:45 PM PDT by Danae (No political party should pick candidates. That's the voters job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Danae
There is a Divorce Decree in Hawaii that would likely make this a very sticky issue in UK, and it would require documentation that Obama Sr. Was officially legally already married in Kenya.

IF the marriage was polygamous, it would have never had legal status in the US and would have merely been annulled.

Unless, of course, they married in Kenya, but that would put a very pregnant Stanley Ann in Kenya...

126 posted on 09/21/2009 7:54:53 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 243 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: Danae

You have to read the British Nationality Act of 1948. The information on my profile is a starting point to understanding all of this and understanding MARRIAGE MAKES A DIFFERENCE.

Btw, a marriage that is Void Ab Initio can be attacked collaterally after all parties are dead.

The marriage WAS NOT VALID IN HAWAII. the marriage was not in the UK. Hawaii law did not allow polygamy.


127 posted on 09/21/2009 7:56:39 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson