Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Glenn Beck: Harmful to the Conservative Movement (Barf)
commentarymagazine.com ^ | Sept. 21, 2009 | Peter Wehner

Posted on 09/21/2009 4:22:12 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

Unlike others associated with Time magazine, David von Drehle is a skilled, careful, and perceptive writer. So I was interested in his cover story on FOX News’s Glenn Beck, who is considered to be a red-hot commodity these days.

I don’t pretend to be an expert on Beck. In the past I assumed he was a typical figure in the pundit and cable-media world. Only recently have I watched portions of his television program, as well as interviews with him, and heard parts of his radio program. And what I’ve seen should worry the conservative movement.

I say that because he seems to be more of a populist and libertarian than a conservative, more of a Perotista than a Reaganite. His interest in conspiracy theories is disquieting, as is his admiration for Ron Paul and his charges of American “imperialism.” (He is now talking about pulling troops out of Afghanistan, South Korea, Germany, and elsewhere.) Some of Beck’s statements—for example, that President Obama has a “deep-seated hatred for white people”–are quite unfair and not good for the country. His argument that there is very little difference between the two parties is silly, and his contempt for parties in general is anti-Burkean (Burke himself was a great champion of political parties). And then there is his sometimes bizarre behavior, from tearing up to screaming at his callers. Beck seems to be a roiling mix of fear, resentment, and anger—the antithesis of Ronald Reagan.

I understand that a political movement is a mansion with many rooms; the people who occupy them are involved in intellectual and policy work, in politics, and in polemics. Different people take on different roles. And certainly some of the things Beck has done on his program are fine and appropriate. But the role Glenn Beck is playing is harmful in its totality. My hunch is that he is a comet blazing across the media sky right now—and will soon flame out. Whether he does or not, he isn’t the face or disposition that should represent modern-day conservatism. At a time when we should aim for intellectual depth, for tough-minded and reasoned arguments, for good cheer and calm purpose, rather than erratic behavior, he is not the kind of figure conservatives should embrace or cheer on.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: glennbeck; neocommentary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: Terpfen

“The only way Obama will lose is if a Republican wins.”

An election, yes. But not the battle for public opinion. And that’s what Beck is after.

If it was up to the Republicans alone, who knows, they might have signed off on Obamacare with a few meaningless concessions, like a nod to counteracting “defensive medicine” and empty promises about patient-doctor autonomy. As it is, with poll numbers and conservative Democrats against it, Obamacare is in real trouble, and real compromises will be made. Conservative pundits, not Republican leaders, are partly to thank for that.


61 posted on 09/21/2009 9:29:39 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

I didn’t know libertarianism and conservatism were mutually exclusive. I think they have a broad overlap.

Ronald Reagan
“If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals — if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.”
— Ronald Reagan


62 posted on 09/21/2009 9:46:35 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 50... 49... 48...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

This is why I like Beck and Savage better than I like Limbaugh and Hannity. The latter 2 tend to be shameless apologist for the Republicans. Limbaugh and Hannity do point out enough criticisms of Republicans not to be thought of as Republican lap dogs, but certainly Beck and Savage are far more open and honest about the problems with the Republicans.


63 posted on 09/21/2009 9:49:23 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 50... 49... 48...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Michael Eden
Well, I think I’ve said as much as I’m going to.”

Said he, just before he went on to post another 50 lines of text.
Hey, if you wanna make some statement of intent claiming "Well, I think I’ve said as much as I’m going to", at least make some effort to follow through on what you just said will ya, instead of break your word in the very next 20 sentences after that.

If I want to waste my time arguing with an idiot, there are plenty of idiots who are a lot closer to me.”

Yeah
The idiot closest to you being yourself of course.
Can't get any closer than that can you?

If you want to go on deluding yourself that Bush was somehow just as bad as Obama, I can’t stop you.”

Again, no one has ever said Bush deficits were bigger than 0bama's in this thread, apart from you.
You keep creating your own bogyman then attacking the bogeyman you created.
This is about what caused the Republican Party to lose to the Democrats in the past 2 elections. Glen Beck had nothing to do with it.
John McCain, George Bush, and the Republican Party itself, had everything to do with the Democrats winning.

64 posted on 09/21/2009 9:50:51 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
His argument that there is very little difference between the two parties is silly

this one I agree with...yes the GOP often sucks and ignores it's base but the Democrats are now Simply Red.

65 posted on 09/21/2009 9:53:00 PM PDT by wardaddy (Obama, you suck Bro and we are kicking your butt for now anyhow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x

nice post for a bluebelly X.


66 posted on 09/21/2009 9:54:00 PM PDT by wardaddy (Obama, you suck Bro and we are kicking your butt for now anyhow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

while I don’t completely agree I do find your allegories remarkably astute


67 posted on 09/21/2009 9:55:42 PM PDT by wardaddy (Obama, you suck Bro and we are kicking your butt for now anyhow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
The point is, Beck, Limbaugh, the Tea Parties, conservatives blogs, FR etc are doing what the Republican Party should have been doing long ago, when 0bama started his insane spending spree, appointed his communist czars and started doing whatever he could to circumvent the American constitution. While 0bama was busy committing these crimes, Republican “leaders” like Michael Steele were asleep, and Republicans in the congress were not out there holding 0bama’s feet to the fire.
It was this grassroots Tea Party movement, stoked by conservative talk radio and conservative blogs and internet sites, that finally managed to lay a glove on the 0bamination.
Way I see it, whatever helps to bring down 0bama is fine with me, whether Beck is a conservative or not. He has been the most effective force against 0bama so far.
Equally, I'd be quite ok with it, if Beck attacked Republicans in the congress like John McCain and Olympia Snow, if Republicans after take over congress again in 2010, they resumed the wasteful ways that they had when Republicans were in control of congress in the first 6 years of the Bush administration. Congressmen need to be forcefully reminded constantly, that they are there to serve the people, not lord it over them, and that it's the people's money they are spending out there.
68 posted on 09/21/2009 10:14:58 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
I didn’t know libertarianism and conservatism were mutually exclusive. I think they have a broad overlap.

Broad overlap is not equivalence. Conservatives and libertarians agree with the Jefferson phrase that the government that governs best governs least. Differences emerge in the details, and there are enough that libertarians have chosen to form their own political party rather than work to get conservatives elected under the Republican Party. There is a fundamental similarity and dissimilarity between conservatism and libertarianism.

And Beck still needs to make up his mind which one he is.
69 posted on 09/21/2009 10:25:22 PM PDT by Terpfen (FR is being Alinskied. Remember, you only take flak when you're over the target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
Looks like a member of the welfare (international especially) wing of the GOP is wetting the bed over Beck. They had their man to run the country into the ground for 8 years (before squeezing out of his rump the final turd consisting of our current administration). The Crist/Pawlenty/Giuliani/Bloomberg/McCain idealists have done enough, thanks.

Nicely put, but I thing that last sentence sould read:

The Crist/Pawlenty/Giuliani/Bloomberg/McCain globalists have done enough, thanks.

70 posted on 09/21/2009 11:44:17 PM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
The only way Obama will lose is if a Republican wins. Third parties are trips down Liberal Lane: reference Ross Perot.

Not necessarily so: reference Abraham Lincoln.

71 posted on 09/22/2009 12:10:22 AM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
The only way Obama will lose is if a Republican wins. Third parties are trips down Liberal Lane: reference Ross Perot.

Exactly right, but some conservatives are looking for that 'perfect conservative candidate,' and if they can't find that person, they don't care if Obama wins again.

72 posted on 09/22/2009 4:32:47 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Buckeye
Not necessarily so: reference Abraham Lincoln.

Lincoln? Who? Oh, you must mean the first Republican to win the presidency.
73 posted on 09/22/2009 8:43:31 AM PDT by Terpfen (FR is being Alinskied. Remember, you only take flak when you're over the target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson