Shouldn't the fact that it has worked so well before tell you something?
Judge Carter could still rule as all the other judges have but his declaration to try the case on its merits gives me hope that he won’t do that.
If the case has no standing then it has no merit, does it?
Taitz has twisted that quote over and over again. Judge Carter made that comment after he could have quite properly dismissed the case back July when Taitz hadn't properly served the defense. Judge Carter then said that the case would be decided - not tried - on its merits. That is no guarantee that this will ever get to trial.
In thge other case on the east coast the judge was reported to be “angry” or “perturbed” at the way the government has handled their side of the case.
According to reports I've read, Judge Carter has found dealing with Taitz to be extremely exasperating.
On a connecting issue: Id sure like to have Orly’s ‘Frequent Flyer Miles.’ She’s been back and forth across the country enough to have been in all 57 states.
And as I said earlier, rather than showing up in D.C. for the cameras maybe she should be working on her response to the defense motion to dismiss. It's due a week from tomorrow, and if she misses that deadline then that's it.
You and I obviously look at the same data and arrive at different conclusions. I watch the proceedings (via the net) and hope for an outcome that will toss the SOB out on his ear. You (as far as I can discern) seem to be more interested in seeing all the “t’s” dotted and the “I’s” crossed. While it is important that all the proper steps be taken I think it is far more important that we get to the bottom of the issue. I hope and believe that Judge Carter will try the case on its merits. I could very well be disappointed in the end but we’ll just have to wait and see.
BTW, do you just sit around all day and night pecking at the keyboard? I have an excuse since I’m retired and mildly disabled... I don’t have much of anything else to do.