That's all I can find right now
1 posted on
09/08/2009 1:24:37 PM PDT by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: LucyT
2 posted on
09/08/2009 1:26:36 PM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
‘age 60+ seems to be the majority. About the same mix as an August Town Hall crowd.’
Angry old people. Public Health care should finish them off, then Gov’t can get down to business. /s
3 posted on
09/08/2009 1:27:30 PM PDT by
BGHater
(Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
To: pissant
Have you found the criminal penalties for submitting a false affidavit and forged document to a federal court?
4 posted on
09/08/2009 1:28:14 PM PDT by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: pissant
5 posted on
09/08/2009 1:28:44 PM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 230 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: pissant
I love that the judge noted the large crowd, and moved to a larger venue.
Getting my popcorn, thanks for the update.
6 posted on
09/08/2009 1:29:18 PM PDT by
smedley64
(Sun Tzu trumps Alinsky.)
To: pissant
Excellent — and a great big Thank You to Gary and Steve.
10 posted on
09/08/2009 1:31:21 PM PDT by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: pissant
11 posted on
09/08/2009 1:31:33 PM PDT by
cvq3842
(Countless thousands of our ancestors died to give us the freedoms we have today. Stay involved!)
To: pissant
Thanks Pissant. This is in the Orange County (CA) Superior court, yes? If the proceedings carry over into tomorrow I will try to get down there and take some pictures and video.
To: pissant
15 posted on
09/08/2009 1:35:52 PM PDT by
j_guru
To: pissant
18 posted on
09/08/2009 1:37:56 PM PDT by
kidd
(Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
To: pissant
Click for more info
Clearing the Smoke on Obamas Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigators June 10 Report
"The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii
In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were four different ways to get an original birth certificate on record.
BC1. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
BC2. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then all that was required was that one of the parents send in a birth certificate to be filed. The birth certificate could be filed by mail. There appears to have been no requirement for the parent to actually physically appear before the local registrar of the district.
It would have been very easy for a relative to forge an absent parents signature to a form and mail it in.
In addition, if a claim was made that neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate. (Section 57-8&9)
.... there is and was no requirement for a physician or midwife to witness, state or report that the baby was born in Hawaii.
BC3. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, a Delayed Certificate could be filed, which required that a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing or the alteration [of a file] shall be endorsed on the certificates, which evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.
The statute provided that the probative value of a delayed or altered certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence. (See Section 57- 9, 18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
BC4. If a child is born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult (including the subject person [i.e. the birth child as an adult]) if the Office of the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year.
(See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961.)
In 1955 the secretary of the Territory was in charge of this procedure. In 1960 it was transferred to the Office of the Lieutenant Governor (the lieutenant governor, or his secretary, or such other person as he may designate or appoint from his office §338-41 [in 1961]).
In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fifth kind of original birth certificate. Under Act 182 H.B. NO. 3016-82, Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that the proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
In this way state policies and procedures accommodate even children born out of State (this is the actual language of Act 182) with an original birth certificate on record.
19 posted on
09/08/2009 1:39:12 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: pissant; LucyT
20 posted on
09/08/2009 1:39:55 PM PDT by
Freedom2specul8
(I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
To: pissant
Thanks. When you find more info, will you start a new thread or post it here?
To: pissant
26 posted on
09/08/2009 1:42:55 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: pissant
Found this on another website:
Why did DOJ wait until the 11th hour this past Friday to file their motion when they have known about this hearing for some time? They file on Friday, today is a holiday and Orlys hearing is tomorrow.
Because the reply by the DOJ was not for the September 8th hearing but rather for the October 5th hearing where the motions will be heard. The September 8th hearing, is a limited hearing.
To: Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; BP2; MeekOneGOP; ...
34 posted on
09/08/2009 1:47:36 PM PDT by
BP2
(I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
To: pissant
no visible media turnout The citizen media strikes again.
To: pissant
38 posted on
09/08/2009 1:52:43 PM PDT by
j_guru
To: pissant
46 posted on
09/08/2009 1:56:21 PM PDT by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: pissant
Thank you! You read my mind. I just went to Orlys website to see if they had any updates. Thank God, they applauded Orly. She needs strength now. Thank God for Orly.
She may yet show those idiots she may not have been in law long but smarter than most and willing to listen and ask for help.
84 posted on
09/08/2009 2:11:27 PM PDT by
OafOfOffice
(Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson