Posted on 08/26/2009 4:32:35 PM PDT by HorowitzianConservative
So Terry Krepel over at ConWebBlog is mad at me for trying to explain why it might not be too outlandish to connect Obama administration tactics to those employed by Mafia Gangsters:
What seems to be happening here is that Swindle is justifying the gangster reference as an Alinsky-esque tactic, but failing to acknowledge his own embrace of it.
Heres a question for Swindle: Obama is clearly in your way of wanting to liberate Americans from the evil of liberalism. How far would he go to embarrass and discredit him? Would you smear him by calling him a gangster, then justify the smear by playing guilt-by-association? After all, whats one mans reputation in the pursuit of the perfect world of conservatism, right?
First of all there s nothing evil about liberalism, nor do I oppose it. Properly defined its a political philosophy I very much embrace. Its leftism (and its various denominations such as socialism and progressivism) which I oppose.
Terry: seek first to understand before you criticize. This isnt guilt by association. Read David Horowitzs ongoing Alinsky, Beck, Satan, and Me series to understand better the connections between Saul Alinsky, his gangster influences, and the tactics employed by the modern Left. Deal with the argument, dont just dismiss it as a malicious smear. Here are links to all the parts of the series:
(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...
I think we can laugh off their ridiculous attacks because we know they’re absurd, but they don’t laugh because we hit too close to home. They spew accusations and names because of their feelings; conservatives need speak only the simple truth to enrage the left.
The Left can’t take any criticism. If you criticize them, you’re a fascist thug and a hater. I just ignore them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.