[kellynla]

"This Primer introduces and explains the Obama Eligibility Controversy, in question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience. We've double-checked the facts presented here, and we've cited the sources of each fact."

[dalebert]

bump

[Safrguns]

GREAT!!!!

now if we can only gain “legal standing”.

[April Lexington]

Keep beating the drum...

The Failed Obama Administration©

[Bullish]

Why would they let a little thing like the Constitution get in the way, when the Constitution is the exact thing they’re trying to destroy?

[woofie]

Should definitive proof arrive that Obama has been lying about his birth I think it will simply be something that will play out in the courts (over decades) ...it might even create sympathy for him

[doodles2]

"With only two exceptions, every American President, who was born after 1787, was born in the United States, to parents who were both U.S. citizens. The two exceptions were Chester Arthur and Barack Obama."

What would be the likely long range ramifications if an ineligible President has signed law or issued executive orders?

BTW- I believe John McCain was born outside the US to parents who were both citizens at the time. Not that it has any relevance to this case.

[kellynla]

"On September 8th, 2009, Federal Judge David O. Carter will begin hearing and "take to trial without procedrual impediments" the Obama birth matter filed by Orly Taitz in Santa Ana, California at 8 a.m. - so the ball will roll forward for the first time. Abama has hired new attorneys to conduct the case on his behalf. Again, adding to his spending of around $1 MILLION so far, to prevent the eligibility case being heard anywhere by any court."

[wisconsin synod Lutheran]

Even if true that Obama should not have taken office because of his birth, the insult to injury would still be . That there still is no leagal way united states citizens can remove such a president after they take office.

[Copernicus]

I guess we are all "birthers" now.

Best regards,

[353FMG]

“...if you were born in the United States and one of your parents was not a U.S. citizen when you were born, your natural born citizenship is in doubt.”

.
This “in doubt” statement will become another source of smoke and mirrors magic to keep the Joker in the WH. The only way to resolve this BC mess is for Congress to DEMAND that 0 fully identify himself once and for all.

Many feel betrayed when they see how Congress completely ignores to come up with an answer to this legitimate question that many Americans have raised for quite some time.

Sheesh, what is so difficult about getting to the truth?

[silverleaf]

thanks!

[plain talk]

So far, the Supreme Court has not resolved this doubt because, until now, there has never been any need to do so.

Just an opion but I think Supremes would rule that a natural born citizen is anyone born here regardless of their parents. I don't agree with that position but I think that is what would happen if this particular court ruled on it.

Doesn't matter - really. The larger issue is there is a cloud hanging over this and it needs to be resolved based on facts and a SC ruling on exactly what is a "Natural born citizen". Let the chips fall where they may. But the sloppiness going on here and lack of due dilligence is truly astounding. We as a country don't even know if our President is eligible. It is mindboggling and unacceptable.

[faucetman]

This was a very good article BUT it was not totally accurate and left things out. No mention of the COLB being FAKE. Conclusions of Obummer’s long form BC saying he was born in Hawaii has no proof. 1982 law update talks about Hawaii when it was a territory. It wasn't a territory in 1982 so why does it include “territory” several times if it wasn't including that time period? Indonesia left out. All references of lower courts and jurisdictions declaring people or defining natural born citizen are IRRELEVANT. Constitution trumps everything. 14th amendment again has NOTHING to do with it as it never mentions NBC. All in all it was informative and has a lot of info for someone who has no knowledge of the issue.

[American Constitutionalist]

To get into deep technicalities, is there or is there not a US Constitutional requirement for the Vice President of the USA to be a natural born citizen ? because Chester A. Arthur was sworn into office after James Garfield was shot and died.
Besides, why do the liberals want to dig up the past, can't change the past, why do they want to insist that Chester Arthur's dad was not born in the USA ?
Chester A Arthur was born in Franklin country Vermont, so he is and was a natural born citizen.

[RoadTest]

I don’t think this controversy would have arisen if Obama weren’t dismantling our United States brick by brick.

[urtax$@work]

When Chester Arthur ran for office, the public did not know about his eligibility

Keep Repeating: WHY. DID. Arthur. KEEP. IT. SECRET..?,

if Obots use CA as reason to admit O, then that train of thought de-rails because CA knew he was ineligible.

[urtax$@work]

When Chester Arthur ran for office, the public did not know about his eligibility

Keep Repeating: WHY. DID. Arthur. KEEP. IT. SECRET..?,

if Obots use CA as reason to admit O, then that train of thought de-rails because CA knew he was ineligible but "we" did not know.

Sorta self-incriminating ;)