To: Scott Martin
To: Scott Martin
His constituents will reelect him anyway. The only way to get rid of him is through indictment. I would almost hate to see the old boy go. When Pelosi first took office she wanted to bypass the committee process and just enact her moonbat agenda directly on the floor of the house. Rangel was too much of a turf warrior and too let that happen and he was too senior for Pelosi to overrule. If Rangel leaves Pelosi will get to stick in who she wants for Ways and Means chairman, and I suspect it will probably be our old buddy Murtha.
3 posted on
08/25/2009 2:26:51 PM PDT by
SeeSharp
To: Scott Martin
Statement: "Charlie Rangel is one Corrupt SOB"
Response: No kidding!
4 posted on
08/25/2009 2:39:51 PM PDT by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: Scott Martin
Whoever wrote that article must be a racist. I can find no other explanation.
5 posted on
08/25/2009 2:41:20 PM PDT by
killermosquito
(Buffalo (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
To: Scott Martin
And that’s just all the stuff that has been found so far!
6 posted on
08/25/2009 2:43:25 PM PDT by
kcvl
To: Scott Martin
You can apply that adjective from the top down starting with our dear leader.
7 posted on
08/25/2009 2:44:41 PM PDT by
Apercu
("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
To: Scott Martin
P> BTW, FREEDOM HAS AN ADDRESS: IT’S HTTP://WWW.JBS.ORG
To: Scott Martin
The title is an understatement.
9 posted on
08/25/2009 2:46:41 PM PDT by
b4its2late
(Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
To: Scott Martin
The guy is oilier than his pommade.
11 posted on
08/25/2009 2:57:21 PM PDT by
doodad
To: Scott Martin
A “one-man corruption machine”? HA! He’s got plenty of company.
12 posted on
08/25/2009 2:58:45 PM PDT by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: Scott Martin
Consequences may be coming soonHe's a Democrat. There will be no consequences of any kind. It will be business as usual.
To: Scott Martin
The only difference between him and a convicted felon is he hasn’t been to trial yet.
14 posted on
08/25/2009 3:12:31 PM PDT by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: Scott Martin
Today we get news that Rangel's 2007 income somehow jumped anywhere from $500,000 to $1 million higher than he originally reported.The writer seemingly doesn't understand the difference between wealth (or "net worth") and income....
15 posted on
08/25/2009 3:53:47 PM PDT by
Zeppo
(Save the cheerleader, save the world...)
To: Scott Martin
Hey, he just forgot all that extra money. He’s a Dem so he gets a pass.
16 posted on
08/25/2009 4:19:39 PM PDT by
wildbill
(You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
P> BTW, FREEDOM HAS AN ADDRESS: IT’S HTTP://WWW.JBS.ORG