Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lenin on America part 7: After the elections in America
Mainestategop ^ | 12/8/1912 | V Lenin

Posted on 08/21/2009 6:34:10 AM PDT by mainestategop

We have already pointed out in Pravda the great importance of the Republican Party split in America and the formation of Roosevelt’s Progressive Party.[2]

Now the elections are over. The Democrats have won, and at once the consequences predicted by the socialists are beginning to tell. Roosevelt’s Progressive Party, with its 4.5 million votes, is a specimen of the broad bourgeois-reformist trend which has come on the scene in sweeping American fashion.

What happens to this trend is of general interest because, in one form or another, it exists in all capitalist countries.

In any bourgeois-reformist trend there are two main streams: the bourgeois bigwigs and politicians, who deceive the masses with promises of reform, and the cheated masses, who feel that they cannot go on living in the old way, and follow the quack with the loudest promises. And so we find the brand-new Progressive Party in America splitting at the seams right after the elections.

The bourgeois politicians who made use of Roosevelt’s quackery to dupe the masses are already yelling about a merger with the Republican Party. What’s the idea? It is simply this: the politicians want the cushy jobs which the victorious party in America hands out to its supporters with especial brazenness. The Republican split gave the victory to the Democrats. These are now ecstatically sharing out the luscious public pie. Is it surprising that their rivals are prepared to renounce the Progressive Party and return to the consolidated Republican Party, which has every chance of defeating the Democrats?

Indeed, this looks very much like a cynical cheap sale of “party loyalties”. But we see exactly the same thing in all capitalist countries; and the less freedom there is in a country, the dirtier and fouler is this sale of party loyalties among the bourgeois sharks, and the greater is the importance of backstairs intrigues and private connections in procuring concessions, subsidies, bonanza legal cases (for the lawyers), etc.

The other wing of any bourgeois-reformist trend—the cheated masses—has now also revealed itself in the highly original, free and lucid American style. “Scores who had voted for the Progressive Party, ” writes Appeal to Reason,[3] the New York workers’ paper, “now come to socialist editorial offices and bureaux for all kinds of information. They are mostly young people, trusting, inexperienced. They are the sheep shorn by Roosevelt, without any knowledge of politics or economics. They instinctively feel that the Socialist Party, with its one million votes, is a more serious proposition than Roosevelt’s 4.5 million, and what they want to know most is whether the minimum reforms promised by Roosevelt can be implemented.”

“Needless to say,” the paper adds, “we are glad to give every one of these ‘progressives’ any information, and never let any of them leave without socialist literature.”

The lot of capitalism is such that its sharpest operators cannot help “working”—for socialism!

Commentary: Indeed, The lot of big wig capitalists cannot help working for socialists because their systems prevent competition and and suppress small business. Other marxists controls such as regualting the media are also useful tools.


TOPICS: Education; Government; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: america; lenin; marxism; ussr

1 posted on 08/21/2009 6:34:10 AM PDT by mainestategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OldCorps; Southside_Chicago_Republican; screaminsunshine; o_zarkman44; LomanBill; kabumpo; ...
PING!

LENIN ON AMERICA SERIES

Episode 1

Episode 2

Episode 3

Episode 4

Episode 5

Episode 6

Episode 7

2 posted on 08/21/2009 6:44:16 AM PDT by mainestategop (MAINE: The way communism should be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainestategop

Looks kike Axelrod to me. Yep the Democrats are Communists.


3 posted on 08/21/2009 6:47:44 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine; mainestategop
Indeed, this looks very much like a cynical cheap sale of “party loyalties”. But we see exactly the same thing in all capitalist countries; and the less freedom there is in a country, the dirtier and fouler is this sale of party loyalties among the bourgeois sharks, and the greater is the importance of backstairs intrigues and private connections in procuring concessions, subsidies, bonanza legal cases (for the lawyers), etc.

Lenin describes life in soviet union under his ultra corrupt commie party. How ironic.

4 posted on 08/21/2009 8:51:18 AM PDT by OldCorps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldCorps

Lenin must of been a Democrat.


5 posted on 08/21/2009 9:42:21 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

He’d be too Conservative for the Democrats today.


6 posted on 08/21/2009 7:28:09 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

bump for later...


7 posted on 08/24/2009 6:21:02 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mainestategop

>>because their systems prevent competition
>>and suppress small business.

Quack, Waddle... Oligarchical Collectivism.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Oligarchical+Collectivism.&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=


8 posted on 08/31/2009 7:29:22 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mainestategop

It’s very easy to point fingers and say what’s wrong, it’s a whole other kettle of fish to come up with a better alternative.

And Lenin’s alternative certainly wasn’t any better.


9 posted on 08/31/2009 7:31:55 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
>>it’s a whole other kettle of fish to
>>come up with a better alternative.
 
Not a kettle of fish, but a kettle of Eternal Vigilance.
 
Time to guide governance back into its properly constrained, American, role; as per the original specification:
 
"TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men..."
 
 
9-12-2009!!

10 posted on 08/31/2009 9:41:57 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson