Posted on 08/18/2009 9:39:37 AM PDT by Bill Dupray
Okay, at 19% it is technically still double digits, but given that the reviled, detested, and utterly evil George W. Bush had an all-time low approval rating of 20%, which was also the lowest figure for any president in history, Patrick is really plumbing the depths.
(Excerpt) Read more at patriotroom.com ...
See post #41...brought to you by a lifelong resident of the Gay State.
If only Massachusetts politics was as "benign" as you describe.
It still existed, weak, but still breathing in 2002. Remember, from its beginning in the 1850s until 2006, the GOP had (at least) 1 or more federal or statewide officeholders in MA (for a century, they were the clear majority, since the state was one of the premier Republican ones in the nation, even holding in the midst of the Depression). The 2006 election marked the first time - ever - that the GOP at a general election had no Republicans winning an office of substance.
Slick Willard’s solemn promise, one of his central planks, was to make the GOP viable and successful again (the only real reason to vote for him in ‘02), which was a complete and total lie on his part (along with everything else). He had no intention of leaving anything when he exited in ‘06 (especially via his annointing of an unelectable cypher as his Lieutenant over a man who was ready, willing, and able to carry on - Jim Rappaport). So yes, Slick Willard finally accomplished what no openly-serving Democrat in the commonwealth, he buried the GOP opposition party. William Weld came close, but Slick finished the job.
“Benign” is perhaps the LAST word I’d use to describe MA politics. It is an ugly corrupt business in the most elemental sense of the phrase.
Tim Murray would then become Governor, of course...
If you're as familiar with Massachusetts politics as am I you understand that a "comic farce" is benign by comparison! ;-)
To clarify:
MA Republicans = comic farce
MA Democrats = ugly corrupt business
:-]
Ilook at it in a rather different way. The Democrats have held veto-proof majorities in both houses of the MA legislature since the Pleistocene Age. One that basis, how does one argue that the Republican party has been remotely viable in MA?
Jim Rappaport’s chance for governor? </= 0, short of divine intervention.
I’ve discussed this and written about it ad infinitum. Go look up my posts on the subject, some of which I recall writing to you. The GOP was within 4 seats of control of the State Senate in the early ‘90s, competitive for half the Congressional seats, U.S. Senate, even statewide. Hardly the mark of a dead party (indeed, my state’s GOP was in worse shape at the time). Flash forward through 16 years of incompetent leftist RINO Governors, and the party is dead.
As for Rappaport, he was a credible candidate, and one who was actually serious about winning. But like I said, Slick Willard wanted no one to challenge or question him or any strong people around him. He couldn’t have done more for the MA Democrat party if he served openly as the Democrat that he truly is (ditto Weld, another Democrat agent, who didn’t even attempt to hide that he was a total phony with his endorsement of the False Messiah).
Nice little stunt. Maybe we should start running GOP agents in the Democrat party to maximize damage and help our cause. Problem with that is that the rodents always smoke out any such efforts, while we fall all over ourselves to promote these Socialist phonies all in the cause of “electability.”
Romney did not collect a salary other than $1 while serving as Governor of MA. That is about the only thing he did, however.
(So yes, Slick Willard finally accomplished what no openly-serving Democrat in the commonwealth)
Romney’s student, Meg Whitman, is out raising her Rodent opponents in the Golden State. If Whitman wins the Governorship, then Romney will brag what a party builder he is. Of course, Romney was a lousy GOP Governor chair in 2006.
Haley Barbour and Tim Pawlenty are running the GOP Governors Association. If we make a killing in the Governor races, then the Presidential stocks of both Barbour and Pawlenty rise.
Installing liberal Democrats pretending to be “R’s” ain’t party-building. Barbour I at least have respect for. Pawlenty has been a disaster in MN, a Slick Willard Lite.
With all due respect, how exactly would you describe a Republican party that nominates 16 years worth of “incompetent leftist RINO Governors” and has failed to make the slightest dent in the state legislature for six decades?
Uh, cuz that’s what we DO here in the BAy State. Just look at good ole Chappaquiddick Ted. I am sure when he kicks the bucket he’ll have a hero’s funeral, too.
We really are Massholes.
Failed to make a dent ? I just told you we were within reach of grabbing control of the State Senate in the ‘90s. The party believed at the time that Weld could lead it back to the majority, but little did they know he had no intention of doing any such thing, which only became apparent after its effects were felt. We had a prime opportunity in the ‘90s to change the culture of corruption and statism there, and enough of a movement to do so, but we had the wrong people at the helm - people with more sinister motives. The result still the same, a dead party a decade later.
The McCain/Palin ticket was up 8 pts. days prior to September 18th.
Obama was losing until the DNC played their October surprise on the economy
and the RomneyTeam attacked Gov. Palin and her children to throw Election2008.
Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
..... Having lived in MA all my life, I have detected nothing in the MA Republican Party that resembles strategy, competence or effective leadership. They are a hapless bunch of disorganized, individually ambitious, cocktail party political dilettantes who like to think of themselves as politicians, but who are patently uninterested in doing the work to become successful at it.
They have occupied a minority position in both houses of the MA legislature for nearly SIX DECADES - most of that time as an utterly ineffectual presence unable in either house to even contest a veto overrride. In terms of statewide elected offices, Republicans are museum curiosities at any level below the governorship. Only three explanations for such a state of affairs can possibly avail: stupidity, incompetence, or terminal cognitive dissonance. The only time the Republicans ever even came close to making any meaningful advances was with the great political winds of Hurricane Reagan at their backs; when those winds receded, the MA Republicans once again simply collapsed into their customary indolence.
Those RINO politicians that you say betrayed the party are the very same individuals nominated by them. These “betrayals”, as you describe them, have occurred not once, but on multiple occasions. This is not an accidental pattern. Think about it. It is endemic to the party itself.
Hey,wait a minute pal! I am *NOT* an alcoholic!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.