[MHGinTN]

When you've been a practicing immigration lawyer for twenty years, we might accept your characterization of him. You've dug deeply for data on immigration and legitimacy. The point is, we really have no legitimate documentation of whom was Barak Obama/aka Barry Soetoro’s father. The only acknowledgment we have is from a divorce decree issued to Stanley Ann in 1964 against Barak Obama, sr. and that material lacks a certified marriage cert or place of birth of the supposed child of the union.

[RummyChick]

You don’t have to accept my characterization of him. You have to accept what you can see with your own two eyes when it comes to the law.

Using the facts that he is using....he is basing his whole analysis on the fact that Sr was his father..

He is wrong unless he can prove Sr was domiciled in Hawaii..and even that is a stretch given the way the law was worded since that particular law that Rolling Stone brought up is talking about SUBSEQUENT marriage..and specifically states “and not otherwise.”...and presumably is referencing a VALID marriage. I would have to see case law .

And if you are going to hold him on a higher standard because he has been practicing immigration law for decades..then you have to wonder what else he is ignoring to further his agenda...because surely someone who has been practicing for 20 years would KNOW about the importance of legitimacy..both in the UK law and the US law.