[grey_whiskers]

Cheers!

[grey_whiskers]

Like *PING*, folks.

Attack of the midnight birdcage liner!

[snarks_when_bored]

Aren't Third World populations already beyond the level of sustainability of Third World country infrastructures themselves? Without assistance from First World nations, how long would it take for mass die-offs to begin? So if First World nations elect to devolve, thereby ceasing to sin against Gaia and regaining favor in the eyes of semi-educated academics from Oregon State University, won't they in fact be contributing to Third World genocide by becoming less able to help support otherwise unsustainable Third World populations?

Just askin'...

[SunkenCiv]

The Wall Street Journal Online. It used the topic of so-called "birthers" to introduce the left-leaning interest of "anti-birthers"... in relation to overpopulation. It was quoting an article from a couple of statistics professors at Oregon State University, pontificating from their lofty self-annointed perch, about the dangers to the environment from population growth... the authors held up the Third World -- more specifically, their lifestyles -- as examples... First, notice the racism and cultural biases exhibited, apparently unconsciously, by the authors... the authors seem to engage in racism against those of European heritage, and those of Asiatic extraction, at one and the same time... and attempt to keep the indigenous peoples at a low socioeconomic level too... Second, for all their talk of "environmental impact" from Western children, the authors fail to take note of another even more potentially dangerous side effect, from a lack of Western children. Demographics is destiny.

Thanks grey_whiskers.

[SunkenCiv]

Oh, and BTW, I think you're my favorite 'blog pimp. ;')

---

---