She says she is against it. You say she is for it. Until she proves different, I take her word. She says there is a pathway to citizenship. There is. Your own ancesters probably used it if you live in the US and are not a native Indian.
And that was mean’t exactly the way she said it. The headline of this article completely contradicts what is in the article itself.
Are you opposed to legal immigration? If you are, then I can see how you would fault what she said. Legal immigration, going through the processes to become a citizen is exactly what she meant. That is what the “pathway” is. Tell us how she could have worded what she said to better convince you that she is opposed to ILLEGAL immigration.
Sarah was the governor of Alaska. Federal Immigration officials are supposed to be responsible for enforcing existing law. As another poster said, she wasn’t the dictator.
You too are assuming Palin did not mean what she said and what she did to suppoert illegals in Alaska.
There have been many posts on this list and thread detailing her position.
I used to assume the same thing you do, until I read her own words.
Your statment that she said the opposite if what she said and did will not cut it.