Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This is the first time I posted anything so please give me pointers if I erred.
1 posted on 08/05/2009 10:05:26 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

She treats the Constitution like her face. “Little here....’little there....oh, is that looking a bit old and tattered? Never mind. That was created by a bunch of old dead, white guys, anyway. Let’s INJECT something else ENTIRELY that makes me look good. The American people will never notice the difference.”


2 posted on 08/05/2009 10:10:56 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Obama. Clear and Pres__ent Danger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Its just another way to discredit, demean, & discourage anyone in opposition to the evil emanating from the WH! What they haven’t figured out yet is that the more they try to twist what is really going on, the stronger the opposition becomes....discourage us? I don’t think so!


3 posted on 08/05/2009 10:11:43 PM PDT by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
When speaking in their official capacity, legislators can say virtually anything without fear of civil liability. Just ask John Murtha. And, Pelosi really doesn't have the authority to enforce any kind of action against these protesters - wrong branch of government. As despicable as her words and words are, for the most part, they're just words.

Obama, on the other hand, with his compiling of people's names and their "fishy" comments could could be seen as a threat of intimidation, a vehicle to stifle political debate. He probably doesn't get all the way there, but he comes far to close for The President of the United States. I personally believe that this action is unprecedented in American history. As bad, possibly worse than Nixon's enemy list. And, we all know how that turned out.

4 posted on 08/05/2009 10:22:43 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

The First Amendment does not give us the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It merely enumerates a pre-existing right given us by our creator.


6 posted on 08/05/2009 10:25:57 PM PDT by wastedyears (The Tree is thirsty and the hogs are hungry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Spelling in the title could use some work.

You posted in Bloggers/Personal. Good on you.

“it certainly violates the spirit of the first amendment.”

It does.

Overall, I give this post a C+. Spelling errors mark down.


10 posted on 08/05/2009 10:35:22 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

She is painting us as ACORN, we all know that they are paid and shills for the left.


16 posted on 08/05/2009 11:23:28 PM PDT by SERE_DOC (My Rice Krispies told me to stay home & clean my weapons! How does one clean a phase 4 plasma rifle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Madam Speaker had nothing to say about the protesters who hounded GWB or when the freaks in pink tried to smear blood on SoS Condi Rice, so she can kiss my @ss


18 posted on 08/05/2009 11:32:45 PM PDT by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson