Posted on 08/05/2009 10:05:25 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
She treats the Constitution like her face. “Little here....’little there....oh, is that looking a bit old and tattered? Never mind. That was created by a bunch of old dead, white guys, anyway. Let’s INJECT something else ENTIRELY that makes me look good. The American people will never notice the difference.”
Its just another way to discredit, demean, & discourage anyone in opposition to the evil emanating from the WH! What they haven’t figured out yet is that the more they try to twist what is really going on, the stronger the opposition becomes....discourage us? I don’t think so!
Obama, on the other hand, with his compiling of people's names and their "fishy" comments could could be seen as a threat of intimidation, a vehicle to stifle political debate. He probably doesn't get all the way there, but he comes far to close for The President of the United States. I personally believe that this action is unprecedented in American history. As bad, possibly worse than Nixon's enemy list. And, we all know how that turned out.
“Let’s INJECT something else ENTIRELY that makes me look good. The American people will never notice the difference.”
This kind of behavior is not making her look good. When you resort to calling people Nazis you’ve pretty much conceded the argument.
The First Amendment does not give us the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It merely enumerates a pre-existing right given us by our creator.
Yep. She’s ‘made a rod for her own back’.
It merely enumerates a pre-existing right given us by our creator.
_______________________________________
Which is why the statists want to quell ANY reference to God.
I’ts kinda scary she is third inline to be president though. Obama is so used to Chicago politics I’m sure this seems normal to him.
Spelling in the title could use some work.
You posted in Bloggers/Personal. Good on you.
“it certainly violates the spirit of the first amendment.”
It does.
Overall, I give this post a C+. Spelling errors mark down.
As if she cares about what a couple of uppity colonialists thought over 230 years ago.
Thanks, one to many m’s I guess. I wasn’t sure were to post but I for sure didn’t want a “Why is this in Breaking News”
LOL! I used to get that a lot.
She is painting us as ACORN, we all know that they are paid and shills for the left.
your comment:"Overall, I give this post a C+. Spelling errors mark down."
reminded me of something that happened to me 34 years ago!
I was stationed in Okinawa as a newly wed (left my bride in North Carolina, for the Marines did not look kindly on young married Marines) any way I wrote my bride and she sent it back CORRECTED!
So I told her during one of the first $5.00 a minute phone calls that if she did that again I would not write anymore!
Madam Speaker had nothing to say about the protesters who hounded GWB or when the freaks in pink tried to smear blood on SoS Condi Rice, so she can kiss my @ss
I do judge people on how they communicate.
If something is spur of the moment, I can forgive a spelling or grammar error.
But, when writing something that you may be passionate about, or you are trying to make a point, you should sound authoritative.
LOL, I didn’t think he was evil, I reserve that for some in Washington. Your story is like my dad’s. When he went in the Navy he wrote home regularly. when he came home on leave Gramma had shown his letters to some family. They kidded him about his atrocious spelling and Gramma said that was the end of the letters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.