Posted on 08/05/2009 6:40:35 AM PDT by Edward Watson
Obama's attitudes extend to all aspects of his presidency.
Is your name Jim Thompson? Go start your own forum and you can ban all “birthers”. Like me.
When all else fails, fall back on the standard accusation.
YOU said:Agreed...there are so many other tangible issues to be fighting Obama on. Not to mention the mission of educating and changing peoples minds in preparation for the 2010 and 2012 elections.
This President has not been vetted by ANYONE. What can one do besides phone calls, letters and protests? Spend the rest of their time investigating the shadow that says his name is Obama.
People have BEEN protesting and it got us nowhere. You fight him on all fronts. ONE issue won't do it.
Haha!
Rush Limbaugh: “Liberals ALWAYS let you know when you’ve scored a bulls-eye.”
They’re screaming like stuck pigs!
Freepers, there’s enough conservatives to pursue Omoslem’s refusal to show his BC, and at the same time, to oppose Omoslem on the issues.
Barry Soetoro is just one Commie. We are many non-commies.
Just as we could fight in Iraq AND Afghanistan at the same time (but we were told that was impossible), we will oppose this commie on the issues, WHILE tracking down his BC and college records.
Or, we could just QUIT because admitted Nazi Collaborator George Soros plants a few suggestions in the blogosphere that we should just give up.
Screw Omoslem. Screw the naysayers. If we can’t nail Soetoro on Communism or selling out our allies or purposely destroying the US economy, we’ll nail him on ‘tax evasion’ just like Al Capone. Or on being an illegal alien or non-natural-born citizen.
One way or another, we’ll get that dirty commie. He’s filthy up and down. He can slither, but he cannot hide.
Born on US soil is a Natural Born Citizen. That was English Common Law at the time of the Declaration and Constitution. Has it changed since then? Then name the law or court case that spells it out.
“Self explanatory” of a legal term doesn’t fly in a court of law.
Sheesh!
Why not multi task?
Maybe FReepers can, but I guarantee you that at least 80% of the dufus electorate who voted for nObama can't.
We need to find and focus on those issues (higher and higher taxes, soon-to-be lack of health care, etc.) that the AVERAGE AMERICAN can understand and realize what nObama is trying to pull on us.
While we can sit and debate the legitimacy of the TOTUS, most people's eyes just glaze over when you start spouting the facts on it. Worse yet, since Letterman, Maher and the other pseudo-newsies on the boob tube have declared anyone who questions "the One's" birth certificate to be a loon, it is a losing argument out there.
Fight the battle, fine. Just understand that it will do absolutely Jack-spit out there in convincing the general public to vote out TOTUS and his band of Czars.
I have been a manager and an auditor for 30 years. I can smell a turd in a Zip Lock bag at 100 feet. I do not know what 0 is hiding and to some extent I do not care, I just want the LAW followed and to know that he is legitimate when he issues life and death orders to my offspring who are in the Military.
I have been a manager and an auditor for 30 years. I can smell a turd in a Zip Lock bag at 100 feet. I do not know what 0 is hiding and to some extent I do not care, I just want the LAW followed and to know that he is legitimate when he issues life and death orders to my offspring who are in the Military.
We were told that if Hillary or McCain had anything on him they would use it.
We were also told by Obama that if he was attacked on the issue of his birth certificate he would destroy either Hillary or McCain if they dared to attack him on this issue.
So as a recap since well before the election we have been told that we must beat him on the issues, and that no one can attack him on his birth certificate or he will destroy all that oppose him on this matter.
YOU HAVE FAILED TO BEAT HIM ON THE ISSUES.
Why now do we have to continue to follow a strategy that has failed every time it has been used against him?
Fair play and open debate do not work against this man, he does not play by the rules and he silences his critics with threats against them.
It is not importatnt to him, he is Canadian
Perhaps, Edward, when and if you become a citizen of the United States, your point of view will matter. As a non-citizen, it does not.
Obama’s evasive behavior in this matter reflects badly on HIM, not on us.
I don’t think he’s legitimate for a few reasons. But even if he is, how does asking for documented proof make US look bad? People who are buying into that meme are the ones falling into the Alinsky trap.
Images on the Internet are not proof of anything. He mislabeled his Certification of Live Birth (COLB) as “Barack Obama’s Official Birth Certificate,” and urged his followers to spread the word he’d provided “proof” when that was NOT the long-form birth certificate we were looking for.
In addition, the COLB he showed us appears to be FORGED; it is missing creases, stamp and signature, and has numerous other problems. It first turned up on DailyKos, and it seems to have come from a template on PhotoBucket.
I am embarrassed by the conservatives who accept this as proof of eligibility.
The only people who claim to have seen a hard copy of the COLB are a few people from Obama shills FactCheck. FactCheck has ties to Obama through the Annenberg Foundation, which funds FactCheck and also funded Obama and Bill Ayers’ Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Even if FactCheck is not in on the gag, what expertise do they have in vetting the document? Why can’t other news outlets also see it?
For every “proof” the Obama team has offered up, there is a corresponding lie, inconsistency, alternate explanation, or loophole. He has potential citizenship ties to the US, Britain, Kenya, and Indonesia, and no one knows exactly if or when he was a citizen of each of these countries.
With all the unanswered questions and all the lies we have been told by the Obama team, the media, and others, it is more than reasonable to demand a full review of all Obama’s hidden documentation: birth certificate (short and long form), passport records, Selective Service registration, and school records that would help us unravel Obama’s complicated citizenship status - which we now know NO OFFICIAL body has ever checked.
Even if Obama has all the proof in the world and is hiding it away to spring it on us later in some sort of a trap, it STILL reflects badly on him. He promised TRANSPARENCY. He promised to UNIFY the country. His actions are evasive and polarizing.
This issue reflects badly on Obama ALL AROUND.
We’re NOT trying to win a popularity contest with the hardcore leftists. We’re trying to win the hearts/minds of reasonable people by exposing Omoslem.
If we had VIDEO of Omoslem’s birth in Kenya or wherever that Commie was born, and showed it to libs, they’d say its not him. Then they’d say OK its him, he lied, but everybody lies about their birth.
In other words, they’ll never agree with Freepers. Ever. Everrrr. Get over it.
They’re screaming like stuck pigs because Omoslem’s polls are plummeting. We’re helping his polls plummet by raising the issue of how he’s blowing $$$$ to keep all his records sealed.
If this is so painful for Omoslem, why won’t he release the BC? Or his college records. Because he’s hiding something big.
If you think Omoslem’s lying NOW on the world stage, in broad daylight, just think how many crimes he committed in relative privacy BEFORE he became a Senator!
Omoslem is dirty. That much we know. The question is “dirty in exactly which ways,” and exactly how do we expose it.
Remember how the leftists IGNORED Limbaugh for decades? Until early 2009. They don’t attack directly until they are VERY WORRIED.
That’s why Birthers, and Freepers, and John Q Public are getting attacked nonstop by the SRM now.
They don’t attack until they have no choice. Their attack, in itself, shows we’re already winning.
Anything that can be thrown at him, should be and the more sand we can dump in his undies, the better.
All he's got to do is show the certificate. His refusal points up his supreme arrogance and contempt for the Constitution and the country.
To the editor:
The selective memory of liberals never ceases to amaze me. In the midst of a Sound Off whine, the commentator labeled "No Democrats?" bleated, "Why are people so mean and hateful of this future president? I don't understand this. Give the guy a chance."
Give Obama a chance? Let's take a walk down memory lane. Remember the screams that Bush stole the 2000 election? That he was poisoning children by putting arsenic in the water? That he was killing millions by not funding stem-cell research?
Remember the bumper stickers? "He's not MY president!" "Somewhere in Texas a village is missing its idiot." "Re-Defeat Bush" and, of course, the ubiquitous "1-20-09."
Let's remember the supposed "loyal opposition" Harry Reid on the floor of the Senate screaming that the war in Iraq was "lost," Jack Murtha slandering an innocent platoon of Marines as cold-blooded murderers and Washington Congressman Jim McDermott telling CNN "I trust Saddam Hussein more than I trust George Bush."
Have you forgotten Nancy Pelosi traveling to Syria to meet with Bashir Assad, or Jimmy Carter groveling to Hugo Chavez, both insisting they had as much right to conduct foreign policy as the elected president of the United States?
Or let's just talk plain slander "BusHitler," "Bush Lied, People Died," "Bush is a cocaine freak." "Bush is a dry drunk." "Bush is a fascist." "Bush knew Sept. 11 was going to happen." Just for fun, why not Google "chimp" or "chimpy Bush."
You'll find thousands of Web sites comparing George Bush to a monkey, or slamming him as a subliterate moron who can't even tie his own shoes.
For the last eight years, the Democrats have blackmailed this country. "Put us in office," they made it clear, "or we will ruin you. We will lie. We will give aid and comfort to the enemy. We will leak top-secret intelligence to the New York Times. We will use organizations like Code Pink and CAIR to funnel money and weapons to the Iraqi resistance. We will slime George Bush at every turn and do our best to destroy his administration." But now that B. Hussein Obama has been elected, people like "No Democrats?" think we should just shrug our shoulders and fall in line?
Sorry, no. Your filthy party has poisoned the political well, and it's long past time you had a good stiff dose poured down your throats. "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism!" you screamed incessantly, and so I plan to dissent.
Obama is not my president. I do not wish him well. I will laugh at his mistakes and cheer his stumbles. I want the GOP to block, hinder and slam him at every turn. I want him driven from office four years from now a broken man with his administration in ruins.
In short, I want Obama given the same respect and deference that Democrats have given George Bush since November of 2000.
CHRISTOPHER DIGRAZIA
Bradford
Your lectures on being distracted...have distracted me from other more important threads.
What you propose is a losing strategy.
Nope. Not enough to be born here. Your parents must be citizens in order for one to be "natural born".
1758
Also quoted is an excerpt from "The Laws of Nations" by Emmerich de Vattel, a book published in 1758, which Justice Scalia has used to define other terms in the Constitution:
"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."
I got news for you: his illegitimacy is the issue (period)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.