“You can’t do that.”—
You wanna bet?
I guess that makes him a RINO or an 0bama supporter.
/sarc
Not exactly a slam. He’s just concentrating on other issues.
I’m betting that Josehp Farah and WorldNetDaily is going to be the last major news source (eventually) who still pursues the birth certificate issue... Mind you, I’ve liked WorldNetDaily from the beginning and think it’s a fine news source. I’m just saying that I think they’re going to be the last one standing... of the major news sources (not talking about blogs, now... :-) ... ).
WorldNetDaily should be supported as a good news source for many of their stories that they write about and their conservative stance and their Christian worldview.
Keep supporting them. I’ve been doing so since they started... and that was long before any birth certificate issue ever came out.
I sure agree with Glenn. He is a great fighter for the conservative movement. We need to take what he says to heart. Our local “Letters to the Editors” are kookifying the right on this futile obsession. It is dieing out.
Do the radiocarbon test of the paper of the birth certificate. Here’s one that was tested and found to be a fake document from 1950 http://www.benhammott.com/radiocarbon_message1_test.html
Of course we can.
I like Glenn Beck, but he is not thinking right or clearly on this one
You mean like, so it doesn’t matter?
There a lot of media people who are going to get ZOT’ed PDQ. We use them for entertainment but frankly they are becoming useless.
Isn’t Glenn the one that gave a clarion call for all of us to pick an issue that is important and focus on it?
Now he is saying what? Yeah, that makes sense.
Thanks Glen.
This is coming from the highest leadership people in the Fox News organization. There is NO ONE on Fox that is supporting the constitutional requirement that Obama be a natural born citizen. (If I am wrong please name one.)
They are either silent, say there are more important matters, or insult the birthers such as Coulter and OReilly have done. If I am wrong please name one.
I suggest that we start inundating the highest executives of Fox News. Is is possible that the chief executives of Fox woke up one morning with a horse's head in their beds?
To: Glenn Beck:
re: “Even if it was true, what, are you going to take him out of office?” “You can’t do that.”
This is a major event in America’s history and it will take some courage to undo the damage. As the old saw goes: “The people who say it can’t be done shouldn’t get in the way of the folks who are doing it.”
Here is the executive summary:
O has always had the burden of proving he is qualified. He acknowledged that burden when he signed or arranged for his agent(s) to sign each state’s primary election certification that he was qualified/eligible for the office of the president. Such execution, of course, was made under penalty of perjury.
Later, during the January 8, 2009 Joint Session called solely for the purpose of assuring America that the election was conducted properly, Obama had the burden of satisfying any request by Congress to demonstrate his citizenship (see 20th Amendment, “…if the President elect shall have failed to qualify…” as well as 3 USC 15).
O’s duty is a continuing duty.
Imagine that through the failure of Congress to conform with 3 USC 15, the EC votes for and the Congress accepts Mickey Mouse as president. Is the nation bound by that action or can Congress take steps to correct that Constitutional defect? While there may be no legal precedent, clearly the latter is obvious.
Further imagine that a Republican from each chamber of Congress stands and moves for corrective action; specifically, that Congress correct the fact that it overlooked its obligation under 3 USC 15 but the motion is defeated by the Dem/Socialists. Would those members have standing to present the Constitutional defect to the USSC? One would hope so. Will the USSC be able to resolve the issue? Not directly, only Congress can correct its mistake, and that is the way we should want it.
But if the Court agrees Congress’ failure to conform with its statute was unconstitutional and the Congress continues to take no action there will be substantial political reverberations.
At some point in that process, O’s handlers may well cause him to resign rather than risk what they have achieved (much of which may be in the small print of unread legislation). They would accept Biden and Hillary as backup players.
And, that may slow the leftist juggernaut that has its arms around our nation.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2296931/posts
The firestorm would be huge if it was proven that 0bama is not a natural-born citizen and inelgible to be POTUS. It would lead to violence if he insisted on staying in office.
He's still essentially saying something that amounts to "Let's forget about the Constitution and the truth, if sticking to it would cause serious civil disorder."
“Even if it was true, what, are you going to take him out of office?”
Uh, yeah... Generally, I agree with Glenn, but he’s off the mark on this one. The Constitution is very clear on the eligibility requirement for the office of President. If we are to be a nation of laws, then we should start with the foundational law of the land, the Constitution. There is provision in the law for amending the Constitution.
IF the talking heads want to change the Constitution, let them start the amendment process. Short of that, they should be standing with us to enforce it...all of it.
It’s time to take back the country.
Beck appears to be manic depressive.
He needs to seek help.
” “You can’t do that.”—WND “
Really? Says who? An foreigner who no doubt has committed many federal crimes cannot be removed from office???