Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Notwithstanding Obama's actual place of birth, which remains open until corroborative evidence is obtained, if Obama was, indeed, born in Hawaii, even though his admitted father was a British subject at the time of his birth, and even if a valid marriage certificate does exist, it would not have been recognized as legally binding in Hawaii at the time of his birth. In effect, Obama was born out of wedlock. If this proves to be the case, Obama would be a natural born U.S. Citizen, having been "natural born" by a U.S. Citizen in Hawaii.

As I say, until Obama can demonstrate he was actually born in Hawaii, the case continues. But as far as being a natural born U.S. citizen, if he was born in Hawaii, he would be a natural born U.S. Citizen.

If anybody has any contrary points to be made along these lines, I would be glad to elaborate my thinking on the subject.

I will say, I do believe the correct definition of a "natural born" U.S. citizen is of being born of two U.S. citizens -- without question. But when only one parent is legally recognized, and that parent is a U.S. citizen, and the child is born in the U.S., the child is a "natural born" U.S. citizen.

ex animo davidfarrar

1 posted on 07/23/2009 8:07:18 PM PDT by DavidFarrar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: DavidFarrar

2 posted on 07/23/2009 8:09:46 PM PDT by Crazieman (Feb 7, 2008 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1966675/posts?page=28#28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar
I will say, I do believe the correct definition of a "natural born" U.S. citizen is of being born of two U.S. citizens -- without question. But when only one parent is legally recognized, and that parent is a U.S. citizen, and the child is born in the U.S., the child is a "natural born" U.S. citizen.

But when only one parent is legally recognized

This contradicts your premise so I don't know how you are proceeding with the argument.

3 posted on 07/23/2009 8:11:37 PM PDT by frogjerk (It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible - George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

NEWSPAPER “evidence” proves NOTHING, alas. The Mighty Media Monolith will print whatever they are PAID to print.


5 posted on 07/23/2009 8:12:53 PM PDT by 2harddrive (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

Do you believe that a child born of one US citizen parent is an American citizen?


7 posted on 07/23/2009 8:13:38 PM PDT by usmcobra (Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

Your supposition is based on the theory that the marraige between Obama’s parents would not have been legally binding in Hawaii at the time.

What is this theory based on?

If the marriage was not legally binding, why is there a divorce decree?


9 posted on 07/23/2009 8:14:32 PM PDT by LegalAlien1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

Why would not his father have been legally recognized? So what if they are not married. The citizenship of the father is known, he was still alive and present. It’s not like they have NO record ofthe father and therefore would only have the mothers’ citizenship to go by determining if he was natural born or not. I could see it might come into play if the father was unknown and/or not there. But this is not the case.

He is listed as the father on the birth certificate. Since when would the marital status change anything, he is his father whether they were married or not. Men are fathers if they have kids, just like women are mothers if they have kids. They may not be ‘husbands’ or ‘wives’, but they are fathers and mothers.


10 posted on 07/23/2009 8:14:37 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

I don’t want to see a newspaper announcement or an online COLB. Just show us the birth certificate. How hard is that? Seriously.


11 posted on 07/23/2009 8:14:49 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar; Crazieman

Look, if he was born in the U.S, I think he was a citizen. My mother was not a citizen when I was born (although my father was not only a citizen of almost 30, but he was also a combat veteran U.S. Army officer), and I am a citizen.

I don’t know that a birth announcement in a newspaper proves anything if the parents could register the birth even if the birth didn’t take place in the U.S. (my understanding of Hawaii policy then). All the announcements I have seen in newspapers (for my son and for me- they had stopped them by the time my daughters were born) were from the hospital.


12 posted on 07/23/2009 8:16:01 PM PDT by conservative cat (America, you have been PWNED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

Who delivered Barak? Do we know or does anyone claim to be the doctor/nurse on call when he was supposedly born in some hospital in Hawaii? I would have to think that someone would remember delivering a child with the name Barak as it is not ordinary.


13 posted on 07/23/2009 8:16:29 PM PDT by frogjerk (It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible - George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar
Anyone born in the US, with very few exceptions, e.g. those born to foreign diplomats, is a natural born US citizen.

It makes no difference if the parents were US citizens or if they were married.

17 posted on 07/23/2009 8:18:06 PM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar
Here is what he is hiding:

Hawaii Birth

NOW WHICH OF THESE BLOCKS IS BARACK AFRAID TO SHOW THE CITIZENS OF THE USA??

1a. Child’s First Name
1b. Middle Name
1c. Last Name
2. Sex
3. This Birth – Single, Twin, Triplet
4. If Twin or Triplet Was Child Born – First, Second, Third
5a. Birth Date – Month, Day, Year
5b. Hour
6a. Place of Birth: City, Town or Rural Location
6b. Island
7a. Usual Residence of Mother: City, Town or Rural Location
7b. Island
7c. County and State or Foreign Country
7d. Street Address
7e. Is Residence inside City or Town Limits – If No, Give Judicial District – Yes, No
7f. Mother’s Mailing Address
7g. Is Residence on a Farm or Plantation – Yes, No
8. Full Name of Father
9. Race of Father
10. Age of Father
11. Birthplace – (Island, State or Foreign Country)
12a. Usual Occupation
12b. Kind of Business or Industry
13. Full Maiden Name of Mother
14. Race of Mother
15. Age of Mother
16. Birthplace – (Island, State or Foreign Country)
17a. Type of Occupation Outside Home During Pregnancy
17b. Date Last Worked
18a. Signature of Parent or Other Informant – Parent, Other
18b. Date of Signature
19a. Signature of Attendant – M.D., D.O., Midwife, Other
19b. Date of Signature
20. Date Accepted
21. Signature of Local Registrar
22. Date Accepted by Reg. General

One or more of these blocks having damning information to Barack. There is no other reason for him to refuse to release this document.

18 posted on 07/23/2009 8:18:41 PM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar
There still remains the issue of his (possible/probable) adoption by the Indonesian, Lolo Soetoro.

This would have given him at the least a dual citizenship.
Would it not?

19 posted on 07/23/2009 8:18:52 PM PDT by Semper Mark (Trickle up Third World poverty will lead to cascading Third World tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

Thank you, that’s wonderful!

Now, just have this Zer0 A-hole stop spending $100,000 per month to cover-up the issue, and have him spend $20 to show us his birth certificate!


21 posted on 07/23/2009 8:19:11 PM PDT by aShepard ("OK Class: repeat after me: "BUSH BAD- OBAMA SAVIOR OF MANKIND")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

At the time the Framers put the Constitution together, the citizenship of the mother was very much a secondary consideration. The crucial factor in determining the natural citizenship of the child was and should remain, the citizenship of the father, and the father only.

Here is definition of “natural born citizen” is that as written by Emmerich De Vattel in his “The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law” (1758):

“…natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owns to its own preservation: and it is presumed, as a matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see, whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for if he is born there of a foreigner, it will only be the place of his birth, and not his country”.

The evidence that this is the definition that was understood by the Framers is quite convincing, but I won’t do more than just assert that notion here.

Bastardy is not an issue.


22 posted on 07/23/2009 8:19:59 PM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

Yep.... Obama may be a natural born citizen after all, but then again he many not be.... Isn’t that still to be determine?


23 posted on 07/23/2009 8:20:08 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

You may have stumbled upon the jaws of the trap.

2011 Presidential Address: “I am a bastard.” tears shedding. “I have fought the Republicans tooth and nail to keep my family’s shame from becoming public, but today they have won. I am now forced to admit that I was born out of wedlock.”


24 posted on 07/23/2009 8:20:13 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar
It doesn't matter if Barry was born on the desk of the Oval Office with Jackie O as the mid-wife. His philandering, communist father was a British citizen per the British Nationality Act of 1948, which automatically transferred (British) citizenship to his offspring. Barry even admitted he was dual-citizen on his campaign website before he took it down.

So either you're trolling or ignorant of all the myriad threads and videos out there that destroy your post.

27 posted on 07/23/2009 8:22:12 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

obama’s mother wasn’t old enough to qualify under the law in effect at that time to grant obama natural born citizenship. As I understand it. I may have my facts slightly incorrect.


30 posted on 07/23/2009 8:24:43 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

Right, well, maybe. The one exception to both parents being citizens would be if the father is unknown. But the father IS known, even though it’s questionable there was a genuine marriage. There might not have been any marriage, or that marriage may have been invalid as a bigamy. So much is unknown!

Nor is it certain he was born in Hawaii.

My best guess is he was born in Canada!


32 posted on 07/23/2009 8:25:45 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DavidFarrar

Nice to make a vanity on an issue that has been explained and explained and explained.

But let’s try once again.

Ok, you are incorrect that Obama would have been a “Natural Born Citizen” due to his mother being a US Citizen.

From 1952 to 1986, if a child is born to ONE US citizen and ONE NON-CITIZEN, citizenship will transfer AS LONG AS THE US CITIZEN HAS LIVED IN THE US FOR AT LEAST 10 YEARS, FIVE OF WHICH OVER THE AGE OF 16 (or 14 as some legal scholars have said). EITHER WAY, OBAMA’S MOTHER WAS 18, not old enough to transfer citizenship ON HER OWN MERIT.

Therefore, Obama is ONLY a citizen of what nation his FATHER was. Being born here (or anchor baby) did not automatically apply until 1986. So some (and justifiably) have argued even if he was born here, he is still not even a citizen, much less natural born.

However I feel most would accept being born here. Unfortunately, Obama won’t even prove that. And I don’t mean show a computer document to a website. I can’t march into the DMV and demand a drivers license with information they can obtain by viewing a copy on a photobucket account I have.


35 posted on 07/23/2009 8:27:27 PM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson