Replies

The photos are available here. Yes, they're provided by FactCheck.org, so they're suspect - yet there has been no viable allegations of doctoring on the high-res set...Yes, there was another earlier scanned copy which was provably and obviously falsified, which of course raises more circumstantial evidence that something gravely illegal is going on. Address that in its proper context as suspicious behavior.

Do you actually listen to yourself when you write? Did you actually read and understand what Factcheck wrote? Do you know WHY Factcheck took photos? Do you know WHAT Factcheck photographed?

I already know that you haven't read what I wrote about it.

Factcheck said that they photographed the same document that was used to make the scan. If the scan image is bogus (or "falsified"), something that I, and I alone, proved last November, which you readily admit, then the photos also have to be bogus.

If what they photographed is what was was actually scanned, then the Seal in that photo would be clearly and completely visible in the scan image (it was barely and partially visible and required image enhancements to see it), and the 2nd fold line would be clearly and completely visible in the scan image (NO 2nd fold line exists, period).

You cannot, on the one hand, forge a scan image and then turn around and say, "Hey, we made an image forgery from a real COLB, but now we are showing it in these photos."

THAT is insanely ludicrous!!!

What you are seeing in Factcheck's photos is a PHYSICALLY-FABRICATED COLB. The photos are real but the COLB object is not. I describe how it was done and how I proved that it was fabricated here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2292609/posts

Last November, in a 160-page report, I conclusively and irrefutably proved that the one and only "scan image" of one and only one side of an alleged COLB, which is what you called an "obvious" forgery. If it really was "obvious," then why do the media, Obama supporters, and Factcheck, Politifact, Snopes, Politico, Chicago Tribune, and the Honolulu Advertiser, continue to treat it as being real?

If you noticed it, then why haven't they?

NOW, in addition to what I demonstrated last November, I've now proven, conclusively and irrefutably, that what Factcheck photographed is not a real COLB at all, but a physically-fabricated COLB (and if you want to know how it was fabricated, then you'll just have to read my post like everyone else).

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2292609/posts

So, the only thing that's oblivious is your awareness of reality. The only BS here is emanating from you, and all of the other trolls who still believe that Obama has a real 2007 COLB.

News flash: he doesn't. Obama does not have a 2007 COLB, and never had a 2007 COLB. Hawaii never made a 2007 COLB for him. Hawaii confirmed that. What Hawaii never confirmed is that Obama was born in Hawaii. When Hawaii's DOH Director said that they had Obama's original birth certificate on record, they did not say if it was a physical, paper certificate or from where it came.

But, hey, don't let me stop you, or anyone else like you, from being delusional. It's what trolls do best.