Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 07-19-09 (DUmmies On QAHCAA Health Bill: CBO Director Didn't Say What He Said)
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | July 19, 2009 | DUmmies and PJ-Comix

Posted on 07/19/2009 2:54:40 PM PDT by PJ-Comix

Remember what the Director of the Congressional Budget Office said late last week about the Obama QAHCAA (Quality, Affordable Health Coverage for All Americans---official title) health plan? ALL news sources reporting on it say that the director stated that it would INCREASE the deficit. However, despite what the CBO Budget Director actually said, the DUmmies are hailing the budgetary gymnastics emanating from Nancy Pelosi's OFFICE to claim that he really said that it would be budget neutral. Another way of saying, don't believe what your lying ears heard, this is what he really meant. Unfortunately, only the far left loons are buying this. The Blue Dog Democrats and most every other person sure know what the CBO director said which means the probable DOOM of QAHCAA (pronounced the way it is read). However, the DUmmies just can't let go of that tiny sliver of hope as you can see in this THREAD, "CBO Scores Confirm Deficit Neutrality of Health Insurance Reform Bill." So let us watch the DUmmies deny painful reality in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, who loves the QAHCAA acronym, is in the [barackets]:

CBO Scores Confirm Deficit Neutrality of Health Insurance Reform Bill

[What you heard the CBO director say, he didn't say. Oh, and we've always been at war with Eastasia.]

Washington, D.C. — The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released estimates this evening confirming for the first time that H.R. 3200, America’s Affordable Health Choices Act, is deficit neutral over the 10-year budget window - and even produces a $6 billion surplus. CBO estimated more than $550 billion in gross Medicare and Medicaid savings. More importantly, the bill includes a comprehensive array of delivery reforms to set the stage for lowering the future growth in health care costs.

[Oooh! This sounds as good as the Porkopulous bill...and as realistic!]

Net Medicare and Medicaid savings of $465 billion, coupled with the $583 billion revenue package reported today by the House Committee on Ways and Means, fully finance the previously estimated $1.042 trillion cost of reform, which will provide affordable health care coverage for 97% of Americans.

[And we know just how efficient the government is at meeting savings goals. Oh, and that "revenue package" means TAXES. More of them and somehow the economy will be completely unaffected by higher TAXES. BTW, the CBO never claimed the above...just wait until you see the source of this wild interpretation. Hee! Hee!]

“This fulfills the strong commitment of the President and House leadership to enact health reform on a deficit-neutral basis,” said Chairmen Henry A. Waxman, Chairman Charles B. Rangel, and Chairman George Miller. “The reforms included in this legislation will help control health care costs and expand access to quality, affordable coverage to all Americans in fiscally-responsible manner.”

[Now there is a trio you can believe in when it comes to cutting government costs...NOT!]

The estimates also cover important reinvestments in Medicare and Medicaid, including phasing in the closing of the “donut” hole in the Medicare drug benefit. The bill’s long-term reform of Medicare’s physician fee schedule to eliminate the potential 21 percent cut in fees, and put payments on a sustainable basis for the future, will cost about $245 billion. Those costs, however, are not included in the net calculations above, as they will be absorbed under the upcoming statutory “pay go” legislation that is pending in the House.

[Anybody who places the least bit of faith in these laughable budgetary gymnastics has a giant "donut" hole in their brain. And now for the laugh line...]

Read more: http://speaker.house.gov/blog/?p=1872

[Got that? The source for this complete reinterpretation of what the CBO director actually said is a BLOG out of Nancy Pelosi's office. And now the DUmmies have placed all of their hope on this completely unrealistic thread and you shall read...]

Good news

[If Karina the Blogger out of Nancy Pelosi's office says "up" is really "down" then it MUST be true!]

Let's hope this news doesn't go unreported by omission by those who don't follow the Cronkite brand of journalism.

[Let the world know. Karina the Blogger claims that "up" is really "down."]

Elmendorf is a tool. He wants to torpedo the whole thing. He needs to be outta here. This clearly rebukes that idiot.

[But...but Karina the Blogger is claiming that the CBO (meaning him) said it was budget neutral. How can he rebuke himself?]

Huh? Isn't this the opposite of what the same body said just two days ago? I hope this is right -- should shoot down a lot of arguments.

[I BEEEEEEELIEVE IN THE NANCY PELOSI SHILL...Karina the Blogger!]

I'm confused. The CBO doesn't mention any surplus. Here's Elmendorf's statement regarding the new analysis: http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=332 It says the bill will produce a net 239 billion dollar increase in the deficit.

[Don't believe your lying eyes! Continue to BEEEEELIEVE in Karina the Blogger!]

I cant keep up with all these estimates, how can 2 estimates in the past few days say 2 different ..things. If anybody gets this, could you explain it to the rest of us.

[Simple. One is true and the other is a Karina the Blogger fantasy.]

One can easily get 47 different estimates in 47 days-Its who YOU trust & believe is all that matters

[BEEEEELIEVE in Karina the Blogger with all your heart and soul! HALLELUJAH!!!]

Estimates are based on the result you want. Right wingers say this will bankrupt us. Obama says it will save money. The truth is somewhere in the middle.

[And we all know what a magnificent track record he has with this Porkopulous estimate on how it would help lower unemployment.]

The truth is still somewhere in that middle

[And ye shall know the truth but it WON'T set you free.]

It would be interesting to find out what Elmendorf's tax free account in Switzerland has in it!

[Just ask our mighty oracle, Karina the Blogger, for the answer to that.]

CBO says there will be a deficit, but Pelosi and others say there will be a small surplus. The reason for this surplus conclusion is that legislation might pass soon in which Medicare costs won't have to be offset. But will that cost simply disappear? Will it never be counted as part of our expenses?

[LOUSY FREEPER TROLL!!! How dare you cast aspersions upon the veracity of Karina the Blogger!]

How Can 2 CBO Reports Be So Different

[Simple. One is true and the other is the product of the fervid imagination of Karina the Blogger.]

Why would Nancy Pelosi claim this on her blog? That's not what the report says

[All that counts is that it says what Karina the Blogger says it says.]

The info in the letter just doesn't match the headline and news release. What in the world is going on?

[What is going on is a lot of pixie dust being dropped on the heads of gullible DUmmies by Karina the Blogger who operates out of Nancy Pelosi's office.]

I'll take the bad news straight up, TYVM. But don't paint a pretty picture only to have it turn to slime, like the jobs outlook right now.

[Remember the wonderful Fitzmas fairy tale told to you just 24 business hours ago?]

BTW, the discrepancy between the surplus declaration in Pelosi's announcement and the purported $239B deficit in the report itself are explained by Congress's annual ugly patch of the flawed sustainable-growth-rate calculations used to determine how much doctors are paid by Medicare (the calculations always generate rates which are way too low, and if Congress doesn't do their annual fix to shore up rates, physicians would abandon Medicare in droves.) Without the ugly patch, we actually get a 6 billion dollar surplus from HR3200, but because the ugly patch is factored in, the CBO calls it a $239B deficit. The thing is that the ugly patch would be implemented by Congress every year, whether or not HR3200 becomes law, meaning that money would be spent no matter what.

[Is that you, Professor Irwin Corey?]

Yes, you can trust the CBO. This gubermint agency is always accurate and honest. Really! You are getting sleepy. Verrry sleepy!

[And when you awake you will be a blogger in the office of Nancy Pelosi.]

What the f*ck is the CBO head doing saying just the opposite like one day ago?

[Because his words had yet to go through the Katrina the Blogger magic filter for convenient reinterpretation.]

The CBO did not say the opposite

[You...you mean we haven't always been at war with Eastasia you LOUSY FREEPER TROLL!!!]

The director DID say the opposite. I watched him say the opposite of this new CBO report.

[But what did Karina the Blogger say he said? That's what really counts.]

How can the same organization come up with 2 polar opposite conclusions?

[Answer: One happened and the other is what Karina the Blogger said happened.]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: dummies; qahcaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Not only the DUmmies but the KOmmies are also placing all their faith and hope upon the fantasies spun by Karina the Blogger in Nancy Pelosi's office.
1 posted on 07/19/2009 2:54:40 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte; RMDupree; AlexW; CzarNicky; Mike Fieschko; motzman; codercpc; thingumbob; tje; ml1954; ...

PING!


2 posted on 07/19/2009 2:55:53 PM PDT by PJ-Comix ("They spent a trillion dollars on a guess?" ---Astute DUmmie observation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Yo! In before 10 for the first time ever.


3 posted on 07/19/2009 2:56:31 PM PDT by surely_you_jest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thR-lVuztIY


4 posted on 07/19/2009 3:00:41 PM PDT by hattend (Sarah Palin has run a fishing business, a city, and a state. All Obama has done is run his mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Top 10.


5 posted on 07/19/2009 3:03:39 PM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

in


6 posted on 07/19/2009 3:03:54 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

In


7 posted on 07/19/2009 3:05:15 PM PDT by listenhillary (90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

This hokus pokus, mumbo jumbo from the DUmpster is just one more reason to “Just Say ‘NO’ To Drugs”. These people are idiots. I don’t care if each one of them does own a bridge in Brooklyn, they are still idiots.


8 posted on 07/19/2009 3:13:46 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (WWTHD - What Would The Hondurans Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Lol...


9 posted on 07/19/2009 3:15:11 PM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

If Obamacare comes to pass, I can only envision the looks on the DUmmies’ collective faces when they realize that their elderly Mom and Dad got screwed over and they will have to kick in to help out, or that they no longer have access to the nice little plan from their job. I want to be a fly on the wall when they get notice that their child’s CT scan is under consideration by a behemoth government committee of bureaucrats and the kid will have to wait. I want to be there when they are told they may not have the medicine that could help or cure their disease. “sorry, we can’t allow that drug”. It’ll be the worst HMO stories we hear about multiplied many times over.

Our healthcare system needs improvement, but not by this administration. They preach to the DUmmies and KOS Kids who aren’t capable of analysis or independent thought. We have to be proactive, as the children and abject liars are running the country again and we’ll be lucky if there’s anything left when they are through.


10 posted on 07/19/2009 3:20:24 PM PDT by Mjaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
QAHCAA

Pronounce that acronym, lol ... Quackah.

11 posted on 07/19/2009 3:21:18 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Well, I would have been top 10 if my keyboard hadn’t died.

Phooey.


12 posted on 07/19/2009 3:23:01 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (I'm the one Janet warned you about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Nancy is getting stress fractures in her skull bones from her face skin being too tight. She and not just her blogger seem to be saying up is down and black is white.

“On The New CBO Score on Health Insurance Reform Legislation
Saturday, July 18th, 2009 by Speaker Pelosi

The CBO report confirms that The America’s Affordable Health Choices Act delivers on a critical promise President Obama and the House have made to the American people: health insurance reform legislation will be paid for.”

http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?cat=7


13 posted on 07/19/2009 3:23:10 PM PDT by listenhillary (90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

I believe Nancy!


14 posted on 07/19/2009 3:30:28 PM PDT by Roscoe Karns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mjaye
I want to be a fly on the wall when they get notice that their child’s CT scan is under consideration by a behemoth government committee of bureaucrats and the kid will have to wait.

How DARE you insinuate that the DUMMIES would commit progeny?
Lousy breeder troll...

15 posted on 07/19/2009 3:33:12 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
From the CBO blog:

"In particular, the estimated impact of the provisions related to health insurance coverage is based on specifications provided by the committee staff, rather than on a detailed analysis of the legislative language."

The devil's in the details. But who reads the legislation anyway?

16 posted on 07/19/2009 3:39:49 PM PDT by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

QAHCAA, pronounced quack ah! tee hee! ;}


17 posted on 07/19/2009 3:44:33 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I think ‘Q’ without a ‘u’ is ‘K,’ is it not? — therefore, CaaCaa, no?


18 posted on 07/19/2009 3:51:20 PM PDT by bboop (obama, little o, not a Real God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
QAHCAA Pronounce that acronym, lol ... Quackah.

I was thinking more like caca.

19 posted on 07/19/2009 4:01:06 PM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bboop
I think ‘Q’ without a ‘u’ is ‘K,’ is it not? — therefore, CaaCaa, no?

Caacaa, Quackah, either way, it's a great acronym. Highly apropos, lol.

20 posted on 07/19/2009 4:01:11 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson