Eligibility arguments to get court hearing - 'For 1st time, we have a judge who's listening'

WND ^ | 7/13/09 | Bob Unruh

[John123]

filed a request last week in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order and status as a conscientious objector for his client.

Obama can preempt this by granting the soldier his request and the court case will be closed...

[HeadOn]

Amen, indeed.

[hoosiermama]

Does he even have the authority to grant the request?...No win.

[STARWISE]

USA Today has picked it up ...

http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2009/07/reservist-balks-at-deployment-challenging-obamas-citizenship-.html

ARTICLES FROM USA TODAY CANNOT BE POSTED .. ONLY LINKS

[STARWISE]

List of current articles

http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&ned=us&cf=all&ncl=dEzIsjEztaJQbRMQvL-2CaxbTb3LM

[STARWISE]

List of current blog pieces

http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?q=major%20cook%20obama&hl=en&ned=us&tab=nb

[Blood of Tyrants]

I’ll agree with part of that. There is a whole lot of lying around the WH these days.

[Faith]

Thanks, STARWISE, for keeping us informed.

[John123]

Does he even have the authority to grant the request?...No win.

Read this FR thread...

[PghBaldy]

I got excited reading this, but once again, it was a false alarm, I am afraid. Here is LAT’s version of events: “That’s not quite the way Asst. U.S. Atty. David DeJute heard the judge’s comments. Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office, said that “the judge did make a bunch of comments about having the matter correctly and thoroughly aired, once and if they got to the merits of the actual lawsuit, which was not the subject of today’s discussion.”

The key word is “if,” Mrozek stressed. “We’re literally at procedural grounds at this point in time,” he said.

At a previous hearing, Carter had ruled that Taitz had not properly served the case on Obama. In Monday’s hearing, both Taitz and DeJute tried to prematurely argue the merits of the case. Carter, a former marine, told both parties that the case could easily be tied up for months or another year on procedural technicalities. A better approach would be for Taitz just to file the paperwork so that the case could proceed without more delays, the judge said.

Once the paperwork is filed, the government has 60 days to respond. “ http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/07/opponents-of-barack-obamas-presidency-claim-small-court-victory.html

[Katarina]

Thank you so much, for all of this
new information.

[Godebert]

"That doesn't sound right to me... anyone who is born in United States is a "natural born" citizen... irregardless of where the parents came from..."

You are mistaken.

http://federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_citizen_defined.html

[Wen]

If this Judge does so he should be the nominee for the supreme court.We need ones that don’t bow down to or allow the government to control or dictate to them.

[txoilman]

I like to simply what is in Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution: POTUS must be a Natural Born U.S. Citizen (NBC). A NBC is one that is born on American soil to parents that are U.S. citizens.

Mathmatically PER THE CONSTITUTION we have:

Born on American soil = 1.0
Father is U.S. citizen = 1.0
Mother is U.S. citizen = 1.0

Based on Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 to be qualified for POTUS: 1+1+1=3

Here is what we know about OBAMA:

Father is from Kenya and British citizen = 0
Mother is U.S. citizen = 1.0
OBAMA born in Hawaii (assumption) = 1.0

Now we have 0+1+1=2

Since 2 is not equal to 3 then that means based on the U.S. Constitution OBAMA is not qualified to be POTUS.

See how simple this is. Bottom line is that the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES MATTERS!!!!