To: Free ThinkerNY
No, you didn’t take “sides”.
You took *side*, singular.
2 posted on
07/10/2009 7:15:37 PM PDT by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(What kind of organization answers the phone if you call a suicide hotline in Gaza City?)
To: Free ThinkerNY
In the 2008 election, we took sides, straight and simple, particularly with regard to the vice presidential race. He lies to himself. They took sides to the extreme in the presidential election also. Carl Cameron is a liberal, biased reporter.
To: Free ThinkerNY
This revelation is right up there with “the earth revolves on an axis” as a news item.
4 posted on
07/10/2009 7:18:01 PM PDT by
12Gauge687
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
To: Free ThinkerNY
the real loser in this sordid tale is my chosen profession.Sorry, a-hole, you don't belong to a profession. Professionals are bound by ethics. You don't have any.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Of course they did...but in the end, it will work out for Sarah because she will end up being the 1st woman President of these United States and will do a far better job of it than the Kenyan, Obama.
Now that Sarah has initiated her brilliant flanking manuever against the left, the DNC, and the MSM (and throw the RINOs in there for good measure)...it has them all in a frenzy wondering what her next move will be and how it will be perceived...and has them frothing at the mouth in their efforts to discredit her.
Sarah will now get her book out, go on tour, give speeches and promote conservatie principles all over this country in the midst of the Obama administration disaster and gain great political capital in the process. Then she will support conservative candidates in 2010 and help them win, amassing much more political capital. She will then take all of that and make an awesome, stunning run for the Presidency in 2012.
MANY MORE STICKER DESIGNS HERE6 posted on
07/10/2009 7:18:57 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Free ThinkerNY
8 posted on
07/10/2009 7:20:38 PM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Obama. Clear and Pres__ent Danger.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
10 posted on
07/10/2009 7:23:21 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
In the 2008 election, we took sides, straight and simple, particularly with regard to the vice presidential race. Well DUH!
Morons love morons Carl.
13 posted on
07/10/2009 7:30:34 PM PDT by
sausageseller
(http://coolblue.typepad.com/the_cool_blue_blog/)
To: Free ThinkerNY
No, more accurately you degraded your profession and in the end abandoned it to become cheerleaders.
I consider myself a journalist, and I admit my Bias up front, I don’t pretend to be something I am not. I am a conservative journalist, and proud of it. It would have been different if you all admitted your biases and owned up to them. But you didn’t, you lied about it which right there shoots your credibility to hell.
16 posted on
07/10/2009 7:52:50 PM PDT by
Danae
(Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
To: All
Carl M. Cannon is the Washington bureau chief for Reader’s Digest and a contributor to National Journal.
To: Free ThinkerNY
18 posted on
07/10/2009 7:59:23 PM PDT by
AD from SpringBay
(We deserve the government we allow.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
