Replies

I thought that I'd give you a taste of what I've been writing today:

We live in the Digital Age of communication and the virtual world of the Internet that has not only changed the way we send and receive information, but also how we interpret that information. Our interpretation of information on the Internet is heavily influenced by the trust we place in the sender of that information. We have seen instances where the exact, same information that has been sent by two different sources has produced entirely different responses that range from full agreement to total disbelief.

The Internet is primarily a visual medium and its visual imagery tends to evoke more polarizing responses than auditory ones.

The Internet permits hundreds of millions of people to view the same images, and to interpret them in the same way as they were intended to be. The deciding factor, however, in how images are perceived is contingent on the context in which they appear. The people who design the visuals we see, whether it’s on the Internet, on TV, or in print, pay particular attention to structuring the context in ways that convey their own interpretation. The extent to which the public will accept or reject another person’s interpretation depends on the amount of trust that viewer places on its source.

For a great many people, any media that bears the name of Barack Obama, that also bears testimony to his legitimacy as President, will be treated as the unadulterated truth, no questions asked. Barack Obama has a special personal image that he and the media go to great lengths to preserve. Obama engenders the kind of following that a rock star would envy, and being ranked as the top celebrity in America only confirms this status. Part and parcel to that popularity, in the minds of his followers, is the belief that Obama’s biographical narrative is totally true. That is why, whenever that biography is challenged, his followers take it as a personal affront to them.

Nowhere is this phenomenon more apparent than in the digital image purported to be a copy of Barack Obama’s original birth certificate. His followers are incensed that their leader’s legitimacy is being questioned. Conversely, they see no disconnect nor hypocrisy in delegitimizing John McCain in regards to his stated birthplace, his activities as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, his patriotism, his voting record, and most egregious of all, discriminating against him on the basis of his age. Yet, this is a typical characteristic of Obama’s followers in that they can maintain a double standard while simultaneously denying that one exists.

Yet, the cold, hard facts remain that Barack Hussein Obama has hidden from public scrutiny any concrete proof that would validate both his life’s narrative and more importantly, his Constitutional eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

Instead of spending $12 to obtain a certified paper copy of his birth record and presenting it to any government official, be it state or federal, Barack Obama has posted on his website, a fabricated image an abridged version of a birth certificate known as a “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB).

Instead of spending $12 to obtain a certified paper copy of his birth record and presenting it to any government official, be it state or federal, Barack Obama has illegally used $1 million in campaign contributions in legal fees to prevent his real, original birth certificate from ever being seen.

The fabricated image posted on Obama’s own website now become one of the most recognizable and infamous images in political history, and the historical storyline that goes along with this iconic symbol of secrecy is equally as compelling. It’s as if a President declared war, but never expected to fight one.

Yet, for the past year, the battles continue in a war of words and legal wrangling between Obama, his legal team, and his plausibly deniable shills at Factcheck, and We the People, the citizens of the United States, who literally live and die by the Constitution, who wanted nothing more than for both candidates who ran for President to be equally forthcoming when their Constitutional status was in doubt.

I doubt if anyone reading this document would allow an unknown person into his or her home after refusing to provide a legal form of identification. In essence, we allowed an unknown person to occupy the office of President who has also refused to identify himself.

Just as might be the case when you let an unknown stranger into your home and then find all of your possessions stolen, so, too, have Americans let an unknown stranger into their governmental home, and are only now learning how much of our money and freedoms have been stolen.

Most of America should know by now, beyond any reasonable doubt, that an image forgery of a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth (COLB) was posted on Obama's own website, and on the websites of Factcheck, Politifact, and Politico.

Furthermore, no person, devoid of all direct and indirect connections to Obama, his friends and family, his Campaign, his staff, and any and all past and present associates and colleagues, be they professional, collegial, or circumstantial; who currently occupies an unaffiliated and unbiased governmental position of authority, and who possesses sufficient forensic document analysis skills to attest to the authenticity of a Hawaiian COLB that would have been issued on or about June 6, 2007, has ever seen, touched, examined, and tested the authenticity and validity of an actual, paper Certification of Live Birth, date-stamped "June 6, 2007," containing accurate and original birth record information for Barack Hussein Obama II, duly certified and validated by Hawaii's State Registrar and the Department of Health, in accordance with Hawaiian State Statutes.

They should also know that Hawaii's Department of Health never confirmed the production of this alleged COLB document, nor that a request was made for the production and release of this alleged COLB document, on or about June 6, 2007, nor that Obama, a member of his family, or any agent specifically and validly authorized by Obama, had ever requested that a duly certified and validated COLB document containing Obama's original birth information, be produced and released, on or about June 6, 2007, as indicated by the presence of a date stamp and Registrar's signature attesting to that date.

Whereas, the so-called "scan image" alleged to be a true copy of Obama's original birth certificate has been irrefutably proven to a forged and fabricated contrivance;

Whereas, all of the actions taken by organizations, such as Factcheck and Politifact, to denigrate and discredit citizens who have properly and correctly acknowledged that this image is a forgery, have direct or indirect affiliations and connections with Obama and/or his organization;

Whereas, all of the actions taken to affirm the validity and fidelity of this "scan image," represent an intentional disinformation campaign designed to further reinforce the illusion that this forged image is a faithful digital copy of an authentic COLB document, containing Obama's actual and original birth record information;

Whereas, one of these affiliated organizations, known as Factcheck, in collusion with the Obama Campaign, did create additional contrivances to deceive the viewer, including, but not limited to, producing photographs of one or more fabricated COLB documents alleged to contain Obama's actual and original birth record information;

Therefore, Obama and members of his Campaign, Obama for America, in cooperation and collusion with Factcheck.org, did produce false identification documents in violation of state and federal forgery laws.

These specific offenses were committed before Barack Hussein Obama II was elected President thereby making him only a citizen and civilian in the eyes of the Law, and not entitled to any of the legal protections afforded to the President of the United States.

Mr. Obama is also prohibited, by Law, to use any campaign donations to pay for his personal legal defenses; and, having done so, is now in violation of Federal Campaign Financing Laws as well.

Mr. Obama is also prohibited from using governmental privacy laws to shield information from the public that he, himself, has maintained to have released to the public, thereby making it a part of the public record.

He should, therefore, be directed by the courts to provide to the public, by way of an unaffiliated citizens' group, such as the American Grand Jury, the actual document object that Factcheck photographer, Jess Henig, captured in the images posted on Factcheck's website, to be thoroughly examined for authenticity.

This request is made irrespective of any and all requests for Mr. Obama to release his original, vault birth certificate.