[Tarpon]

Aren’t the real questions we should ask about the Wacko-Malarkey climate hoax bill these:

1. How much will the CO2 be reduced if the Wacko-Malarkey climate bill is passed?

2. How much will the earth’s temperature be decreased by the Wacko-Malarkey climate bill?

3. Can you explain how taking money from one taxpayer and handing it to another taxpayer helps the earth’s climate?

4. How does creating a sub-prime market for carbon credits help anybody but AL Gore and his Wall Street pals? Cap and Trade, get it??

Hey, I’m just asking, because the whole Wacko-Malarkey scheme sounds whole lot like reparations to me, with the earth getting the short end of the affair.

[GOP Poet]

The White House has a very ambitious reform agenda - and since Obama campaigned on ambitious plans and won the election, it is his right to pursue this agenda

Another altering of reality and history. Obama did not campaign on these socialist/commie 'plans.' He campaign more as a conservative/moderate. It was upon the latter that he was elected by way of drawing in moderate voters to his already hearty liberal base. It was us conservatives that pointed to his real commie/socialist/very liberal record and the media made fun of us, tried to decimate us, and shut us out.

[ropin71]

bump

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Yes, the stimulus bill was a bit of a legislative disaster, but something needed to pass while the global economy teetered on the brink.

"...something needed?" Wrong, wrong, wrong.